Kelly Valla, PharmD, BCOP, on Dosing Modifications With Tazemetostat for Follicular Lymphoma

News
Video

Tazemetostat use only requires dosing modifications in a small percentage of patients, according to an oncology pharmacist.

For the latest installment of the “Product Profile”, ONCOLOGY® spoke with Kelly Valla, PharmD, BCOP, about dosing modifications associated with tazemetostat (Tazverik) as therapy for adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma harboring EZH2 mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test following at least 2 prior systemic therapies and for those who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options for their disease. Here, she discusses dosing modifications due to adverse effects (AEs) of tazemetostat.

Patients who experience neutropenia can resume treatment at a reduced dose for 3 occurrences, but treatment should be permanently stopped at the fourth occurrence. For thrombocytopenia, patients can resume therapy at reduced dose after the first and second occurrence but must stop after a third. For anemia, patients must wait until it improves to at least a grade 1 event, then they can resume therapy at same or reduced dose.

Transcript:

Dosing modifications are not incredibly common. From an AE standpoint, patients require dose modification at very low rates. Only about 9% of patients in the trial that [supported the] FDA approval required dose modification [and] only about 8% discontinued due to treatment-related toxicities. However, almost a third of patients did need some sort of treatment pause, and that is something to watch out for. However, overall, modifications are not common and are clearly outlined in the prescribing information.

Reference:

Tazverik. Prescribing information. Epizyme; 2020. Accessed May 21, 2021. https://bit.ly/3oBelE6

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Related Content