Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, on Implications of the Phase 3 RxPONDER Trial in Breast Cancer

Article

The breast medical oncologist and researcher discussed how the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy showed clinical benefit in premenopausal, lymph node-positive, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

A study presented at the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium found that menopausal status may determine clinical benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative, lymph node–positive breast cancer and a recurrence score between 0 and 25.

Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, acting associate professor in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine; director of the Glenn Family Breast Center and director of breast medical oncology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, spoke to CancerNetwork about the trial results and their implications.

Transcription:

So, I think that this study is practice changing. And I think that for the postmenopausal group, when you look at two-thirds of the population, when you look at those curves, they fully overlap. There was a hazard ratio of 0.97 and those curves look exactly the same. And there was no benefit even when we did a forest plot of any subgroups and postmenopausal women who are benefiting from chemo. So, for the postmenopausal group, you know, that spares thousands of women, the cost and the toxicity, and all the other issues that can be associated with getting chemotherapy.

Now in the premenopausal group, there was a statistically significant improvement within invasive disease-free survival and also a 1.3% absolute improvement in survival in the group that were randomized to chemotherapy. So you know, that has huge implications for when we sit down with our patients, and we explain to them, “Well, listen, these are the benefits and these are the risks.” This study helps inform those discussions.

Recent Videos
Although accuracy remains a focus in whole-body MRI testing in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, comfortable testing experiences may ease anxiety.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.
Patrick Oh, MD, highlights next steps for further research in treating patients with systemic therapy in addition to radiotherapy for early-stage NSCLC.
The ability of metformin to disrupt mitochondrial metabolism may help mitigate the risk of cancer in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Related Content