Kidney Cancer Research Consortium Efforts May Improve Treatment Outcomes

Commentary
Video

Leveraging novel agents, innovative clinical trial designs, and correlative studies may improve the treatment of patients with kidney cancer.

In a collaboration with KidneyCAN, CancerNetwork® spoke with Eric Jonasch, MD, about the Kidney Cancer Research Consortium’s overarching goal to advance the treatment of patients with kidney cancer through a collaborative effort to refine the field’s therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes.

Jonasch, a professor in the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology of the Division of Cancer Medicine, and the director of the von Hippel Lindau Center at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, highlighted key principles driving the consortium’s mission of improving treatment outcomes in this patient population. Specifically, he described how novel treatment agents, innovative clinical trial designs, correlative studies incorporating biopsies and circulating biomarker analyses, and new technologies may help with targeting tumors more optimally.

KidneyCAN is a nonprofit organization with a mission to accelerate cures for kidney cancer through education, advocacy, and research funding. Learn more about KidneyCAN’s mission and work here.

Transcript:

The question is: what are the missions and goals of the Kidney Cancer Research Consortium? What is my role? I’m the principal investigator of this effort, and it’s a Department of Defense [DoD]–funded grant whose mission is to improve the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma. We’re achieving this by developing a network of clinical trial centers across the country who have expertise, both from the development as well as from the execution perspective. We want to do the clinical trials that industry wouldn’t do otherwise and do the trials that are going to allow us to gain knowledge faster than other trials.

We do this by, number one, using novel agents. Number two [is] using more efficient and innovative clinical trial designs. Number three [is] incorporating correlative studies, including biopsies and other various circulating biomarker analyses, that allow us to get smarter faster when we perform these studies. Lastly, with the tissue that we acquire from these patients, we have some cutting-edge technologies that allow us to look at the tumor in ways that we’ve never been able to look at before. That allows us to see what the cancer cells are doing relative to the immune cells; are the tumor cells happy or unhappy with regards to the treatments we’re providing? How are the immune cells doing? This just gets us closer to being able to come up with more refined ways of improving our treatments.

Recent Videos
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
Immunotherapy-based combinations may elicit a synergistic effect that surpasses monotherapy outcomes among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
A new partnership agreement involving AI use may help spread radiotherapeutic standards from academic centers to more patients in community-based practices.
For example, you have a belt of certain diseases or genetic disorders that you come across, such as sickle cell disease or thalassemia, that are more prevalent in these areas.
Recent findings presented at ASTRO 2025 suggest an “exciting opportunity” to expand the role of radiation oncology in different non-malignant indications.
The 3 most likely directions of radiotherapy advancements come from new technology, combinations with immunotherapy, and the incorporation of particle therapy.
Talent shortages in the manufacturing and administration of cellular therapies are problems that must be addressed at the level of each country.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Related Content