Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology Brothers
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Link Between Placebos and Severe Adverse Events in Clinical Trials

December 19, 2018
By Leah Lawrence
Article

A study shows patients in the placebo group of clinical trials testing against targeted and immunotherapy cancer drugs may experience a high rate of grade 3/4 adverse events.

Patients assigned to the placebo group of clinical trials testing placebo against targeted and immunotherapy cancer drugs may experience a high rate of grade 3/4 adverse events, according to a review and meta-analysis published recently in JAMA Network Open.

According to study researcher Matias Rodrigo Chacon, MD, of Argentine Association of Clinical Oncology, and colleagues, this finding “should be considered by investigators, sponsors, regulatory authorities, and patient support groups.”

Chacon and colleagues conducted this analysis to determine the incidence of placebo adverse events in modern cancer clinical trials. 

“Adverse events (AEs) resulting from placebo administration are called nocebo effects,” the researchers explained. “In oncology, there are several studies about the placebo effect associated with objective response and improvement of clinical conditions, but there are only a few about placebo AEs.”

They looked at publications from 2000 to 2018 that were double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III studies. Only trials with targeted therapy or immunotherapy-related drugs were included. The review screened 731 studies and identified 10 eligible studies for four tumor types (melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and renal cell carcinoma).

Within these four studies, 11,143 patients were in the treatment groups and 4,873 were in the placebo groups.

The overall mean incidence of any-grade placebo adverse events was 85.1%. The most commonly occurring grade 3/4 placebo adverse events were hypertension (2.8%), fatigue (1.0%), and diarrhea (0.8%). The overall pooled incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events for placebo was 18%, but reached greater than 20% in three trials.

“This finding, frequently not included in the informed consents, should be known before making an autonomous decision of participating in a randomized clinical trial,” the researchers wrote. “Although many patients may experience high-grade AEs after a local cancer treatment, the high rate of severe placebo AEs in randomized clinical trials suggests that the use of placebo in any situation in the adjuvant setting should be carefully considered.”

Median placebo study drug duration was 10 to 15 months. On average, about 4% of patients discontinued study placebo because of adverse events.

“Median duration of placebo administration is a factor that should be taken into account when placebo AE reports are considered,” the researchers wrote. “In the studies analyzed, a trial with low median placebo exposure reported a low proportion of grade 3/4 placebo AEs, whereas studies with the highest median placebo exposure reported a high proportion of grade 3/4 placebo AEs.”

Eduardo Bruera, MD, of the department of palliative, rehabilitation, and integrative medicine at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center told Cancer Network, "This study highlights the importance of having a placebo arm whenever possible in therapeutic clinical trials. However, it is important to differentiate patient reported outcomes (PROMs) observed during the placebo phase from PROMS attributed to the placebo itself, especially in longer-term studies."

Recent Videos
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practice in the breast cancer field.
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
Related Content
Advertisement

At a median time to response of 1 month, isatuximab elicited a median duration of response of 10.3 months in patients with multiple myeloma.

Isatuximab Shows Efficacy, Acceptable Safety Across Multiple Myeloma Trials

Roman Fabbricatore
May 30th 2025
Article

At a median time to response of 1 month, isatuximab elicited a median duration of response of 10.3 months in patients with multiple myeloma.


Experts in gynecologic cancer, genitourinary malignancies, and other disciplines highlight noteworthy clinical data slated for presentation at ASCO 2025.

Spotlighting Key Upcoming Presentations Across Oncology at ASCO 2025

Rachel N. Grisham, MD;MinhTri Nguyen, MD;Eric Singhi, MD;Douglas Adkins, MD;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
May 26th 2025
Podcast

Experts in gynecologic cancer, genitourinary malignancies, and other disciplines highlight noteworthy clinical data slated for presentation at ASCO 2025.


Rhenium Obisbemeda Improves Survival in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Rhenium Obisbemeda Improves Survival in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Ariana Pelosci
May 30th 2025
Article

Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD, discussed rhenium obisbemeda and results from the ReSPECT-GBM trial for patients with glioblastoma.


Authors of a manuscript published in ONCOLOGY® discuss how artificial intelligence may help with cancer detection and improving various patient outcomes.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Bolster Equitable Cancer Care

Viviana Cortiana, MS4;Yan Leyfman, MD
May 19th 2025
Podcast

Authors of a manuscript published in ONCOLOGY® discuss how artificial intelligence may help with cancer detection and improving various patient outcomes.


Combination therapies with teclistamab exhibited a superior overall response rate vs teclistamab monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Teclistamab Shows Sustained Efficacy in R/R Multiple Myeloma

Roman Fabbricatore
May 30th 2025
Article

Combination therapies with teclistamab exhibited a superior overall response rate vs teclistamab monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 48% vs chemotherapy alone in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Ivonescimab Combo Shows Meaningful PFS Improvement in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
May 30th 2025
Article

Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 48% vs chemotherapy alone in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Related Content
Advertisement

At a median time to response of 1 month, isatuximab elicited a median duration of response of 10.3 months in patients with multiple myeloma.

Isatuximab Shows Efficacy, Acceptable Safety Across Multiple Myeloma Trials

Roman Fabbricatore
May 30th 2025
Article

At a median time to response of 1 month, isatuximab elicited a median duration of response of 10.3 months in patients with multiple myeloma.


Experts in gynecologic cancer, genitourinary malignancies, and other disciplines highlight noteworthy clinical data slated for presentation at ASCO 2025.

Spotlighting Key Upcoming Presentations Across Oncology at ASCO 2025

Rachel N. Grisham, MD;MinhTri Nguyen, MD;Eric Singhi, MD;Douglas Adkins, MD;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
May 26th 2025
Podcast

Experts in gynecologic cancer, genitourinary malignancies, and other disciplines highlight noteworthy clinical data slated for presentation at ASCO 2025.


Rhenium Obisbemeda Improves Survival in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Rhenium Obisbemeda Improves Survival in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Ariana Pelosci
May 30th 2025
Article

Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD, discussed rhenium obisbemeda and results from the ReSPECT-GBM trial for patients with glioblastoma.


Authors of a manuscript published in ONCOLOGY® discuss how artificial intelligence may help with cancer detection and improving various patient outcomes.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Bolster Equitable Cancer Care

Viviana Cortiana, MS4;Yan Leyfman, MD
May 19th 2025
Podcast

Authors of a manuscript published in ONCOLOGY® discuss how artificial intelligence may help with cancer detection and improving various patient outcomes.


Combination therapies with teclistamab exhibited a superior overall response rate vs teclistamab monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Teclistamab Shows Sustained Efficacy in R/R Multiple Myeloma

Roman Fabbricatore
May 30th 2025
Article

Combination therapies with teclistamab exhibited a superior overall response rate vs teclistamab monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 48% vs chemotherapy alone in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Ivonescimab Combo Shows Meaningful PFS Improvement in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
May 30th 2025
Article

Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 48% vs chemotherapy alone in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.