Low BMI Linked to Poorer Survival in Colorectal Cancer

Article

A new study has found that in patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer, a low BMI could be a poor prognostic factor.

Though a high body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for colorectal cancer, a new study has found that in patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer, a low BMI could be a poor prognostic factor. Among a group of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, those with the lowest BMI had a shorter median survival, according to the results of a pooled analysis (abstract LBA-01) presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 17th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer in Barcelona.

These results were taken from a group of 6,128 patients from the prospective BEAT, BRiTE, AWB, CONCERT, and ARIES studies, which looked at patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer who received treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy.

“There is good evidence that obesity increases the risk of getting colorectal cancer and that it increases the risk of colorectal cancer recurrence after curative therapy,” said lead study author Yousuf Zafar, MD, associate professor of medicine at Duke Cancer Institute, in a prepared statement. “What we did not know prior to these results is whether there is a relationship between obesity and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.”

In the study, Zafar and colleagues classified patients according to a BMI of < 25, 25 to < 30, 30 to 35, and 35 or greater. The median BMI for all patients was 25.3 kg/m2.

Those patients with the lowest BMI (< 25) had a median overall survival of 21.1 months compared with 23.5 months for a BMI of 25 to < 30, 24 months for 30 to 35, and 23.7 months for patients with a BMI of 35 or higher.

Commenting on the data, ESMO spokesperson Roberto Labianca, MD, director of the Cancer Centre, Ospedale Giovanni XXIII in Bergamo, Italy, said: “This study is important because we can now consider BMI as a prognostic factor for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The clinical implication could be that patients with low BMI should be considered similar to patients with more aggressive cancer and probably they should be given more active treatment.”

The researchers found that progression-free survival was similar across all of the groups.

“It’s possible that the lowest-weight patients may receive adequate first-line treatment but then are too sick to receive subsequent lines of therapy,” said Zafar. “That may be where we can focus more attention on improving their outcomes.”

Recent Videos
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Related Content