Treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 resulted in poor outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose tumors had little to no prostate-specific membrane antigen expression.
Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) whose tumors had low or no prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression experienced poor responses following treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy, according to findings from a multicenter retrospective analysis presented at the 2022 Society of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging Annual Meeting.
Baseline PSMA-PET/CT scans were assessed by 1 reader who applied PET criteria from the phase 3 VISION trial (NCT03511664) and determine whether scans were eligible (VISION-PET-E) or a screening failure (VISION-PET-SF).
VISION-PET-SF criteria were defined by the following:
Moreover, VISION-PET-E criteria included the following:
In the VISION-PET-SF population, investigators reported that PSA–progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was shorter, and poorer outcomes were all noted for PSA responses and overall survival (OS). In particular, the median PSA-PFS was 4.1 months in the VISION-PET-E arm vs 2.1 months in the VISION-PET-SF arm (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .025; log-rank P-value = .023). Moreover, the median OS was 14.2 months compared with 9.6 months in the VISION-PET-E arm and VISION-PET-SF arm, respectively (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.89-2.3; P = .16; log-rank P-value = .16).
Any PSA decline was noted in 71.3% of patients in the VISION-PET-E arm vs 41.4% in the VISION-PET-SF arm (P = .003). Moreover, a PSA decline of 50% or more was reported in 50.3% and 20.7% of patients in either respective arms (P = .005).
A total of 304 patients with mCRPC were included in the analysis who had received 1 or more cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617. Of these patients, 3 were excluded due to being lost to follow-up (n = 2) or missing a CT image (n = 1). From there, patients were assessed based on VISION PET criteria, of whom 272 were VISION-PET-E and 29 were VISION-PET-SF.
Outcomes included PSA-PFS, OS, PSA decline of 50% or more, and any PSA decline.
Notably, the cohort did not include pre-excluded patients via local site evaluation. Due to this, approximately 20% to 25% of patients in the unselected group would likely have failed screening via VISION PET criteria.
Hotta M, Gafita A, Czernin J, et al. Outcome of patients with PSMA-PET/CT screen failure by VISION criteria and treated with 177Lu-PSMA therapy: a multicenter retrospective analysis. 2022 Society of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging Annual Meeting; June 11-14; Vancouver, BC, Canada; abstract 3039.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.