Lower EDIC May Improve Local Tumor Control in Lung Cancer

Fact checked by" Justin Mancini
Commentary
Video

Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.

According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, radiation oncologist at Miami Cancer Institute of Baptist Health South Florida, although effective dose to the immune cells (EDIC) of radiation did not exhibit a direct correlation with local control in lung cancer, a lower EDIC might exhibit an improvement in immune preservation and systemic control, especially in combination with immunotherapy.

Akdemir spoke with CancerNetwork® about findings from a presentation given at the 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting in San Francisco, California, titled “Timing and Predictors of Grade 3 Lymphopenia in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Proton Chemoradiotherapy.” He discussed the potential for EDIC to be optimized without affecting target coverage as well as the role of reducing low-dose baths to the body.

He cited literature showing an association between lower EDIC and enhanced local control, suggesting that EDIC can be reduced through optimization strategies without sacrificing target coverage. Although Akdemir’s study did not investigate the relative dose to circulating immune cells, he noted that EDIC values are becoming increasingly important considering increased immunotherapy use. He concluded by touching upon the importance of reducing the low-dose bath to the body, citing a potential impact on lymphocytes and tumor response.

Transcript:

This analysis, in fact, did not directly correlate EDIC with local control, but a lower EDIC implied better immune preservation and could support systemic control, particularly when integrating immunotherapy. In the literature, however, several studies have demonstrated significant association between lower EDIC values and improved local control. Because it reflects overall body exposure rather than target dose, it can be reduced through plan optimization—like beam angle, field arrangement, etc—without compromising target coverage, especially with proton dose falloff advantages.

We traditionally focused on those constraints on lung and heart [diseases], so we did not [investigate] the dose to circulating immune cells. This parameter is [becoming] more important, especially because of the immunotherapy. The effort must focus on decreasing the low-dose bath to the body––not only decreasing the high-dose area. This is important because once we meet the dose constraints, we generally do not consider further reducing the low-dose bath. This is important because this affects lymphocytes and indirectly affects the body’s response [to] the tumor.

Reference

Akdemir EY, Kotecha R, Yarlagadda S, et al. Timing and predictors of grade 3 lymphopenia in lung cancer patients undergoing proton chemoradiotherapy. Abstract presented at: 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting; September 27-October 1, 2025; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 3020.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Two experts are featured in this series.
2 experts are featured in this series.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Related Content