Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, Discusses Topline Data Utilizing KRd in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, at the 2021 International Myeloma Workshop to talk about the most important data from the phase 2 MASTER trial in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

At the 2021 International Myeloma Workshop (IMW), CancerNetwork® spoke with Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, Associate Director for Clinical Research at O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, about key findings from the phase 2 MASTER trial (NCT03224507), which examined the use of daratumumab (Darzalex), carfilzomib (Kyprolis), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (Dara-KRd) in patients with multiple myeloma.

Transcript:

The update that we provided at IMW was the primary outcome analysis, which was the proportion of patients who reached minimal residual disease [MRD]–negativity at 10-5 , [which was] was 80%, across all comers. That was a population that was in reach to have a higher proportion of patients with high-risk disease. Twenty percent of the patients were considered ultra-high risk for having 2 or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities.

We also learned several other lessons from this study. One is that this regimen with dara-KRd is well tolerated and leads to very quick responses in nearly all patients, who had the objective response after 2 cycles in close to 90% of the patients who had a [very good partial response] before transplant. We also learned or confirmed that even though we are using quadruple very active therapy, for majority of patients, we still see a deepening of response with autologous transplant that can be seen both by the higher proportion of patients being MRD negative after transplant. On an individual level, since you can track the burden of MRD, you can see a lowering of that burden with autologous transplant. We also [saw] something very interesting that when you look at 10-5, the proportion of patients reaching MRD negativity [did not] seem to be affected by whether those patients are standard, high, or ultra-high risk. Up to 10-6, it becomes a little bit different and patients with ultra-high-risk disease are less likely to achieve that level of response. We look forward to longer follow up to understand how this different risk profile affects the likelihood of those patients losing MRD negative response; in other words, having resurgence of MRD or progression.

Reference

Costa LJ, Chhabra S, Medvedova E, et al. Daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Dara-KRd), autologous transplantation and MRD response-adapted treatment duration and cessation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Paper presented at: 18th International Myeloma Workshop; September 8-11, 2021; Vienna, Austria. Accessed September 11, 2021.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content