Lutathera Slows Disease Progression in Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors

Article

A novel drug, 177Lutetium-DOTATATE (Lutathera), significantly lowered the risk for disease progression or death among patients with previously treated, advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors.

A novel drug, 177Lutetium-DOTATATE (Lutathera), significantly lowered the risk for disease progression or death among patients with previously treated, advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors, according to the phase III results of the NETTER-1 trial.

Compared with patients treated with octreotide LAR 60 mg, treatment with 177Lutetium-DOTATATE resulted in about an 80% decreased risk for progression or death, according to data presented at a presscast ahead of the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, held January 21–23 in San Francisco (abstract 194).

“While there have been few available systemic treatment options for patients progressing under somatostatin analogues, Lutathera has a major therapeutic benefit for this patient population,” said study author Jonathan R. Strosberg, MD, a medical oncologist at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.

According to Strosberg, many patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors receive first-line treatment with a somatostatin analog such as octreotide. However, there are currently limited second-line therapeutic options for patients whose disease progresses on this treatment.

This phase III trial tested 177Lutetium-DOTATATE, a peptide receptor radionuclide therapy that combines hormone therapy and radiotherapy. The study included 230 patients with inoperable, progressive disease and randomly assigned them to four administrations of 177Lutetium-DOTATATE 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks or octreotide LAR 60 mg every 4 weeks.

At data analysis, 23 patients in the 177Lutetium-DOTATATE group had confirmed disease progression or death compared with 67 patients in the octreotide group. Median progression-free survival, the trial’s primary endpoint, was not yet reached among patients assigned the novel therapy compared with 8.4 months among patients assigned octreotide LAR (95% CI, 5.8–11 months; P < .0001). This equated to a 79% reduction in risk for progression or death among patients assigned 177Lutetium-DOTATATE (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13–0.34).

“With roughly a year and a half duration of follow-up thus far, we can see in the Kaplan Maier curve that the expected median progression-free survival is likely to be longer than 3 years in the experimental arm,” Strosberg said.

Significantly more patients assigned 177Lutetium-DOTATATE had tumor responses compared with patients assigned octreotide (18% vs 3%; P = .0008). There was one complete response and 17 partial responses in the 177Lutetium-DOTATATE arm compared with 3 partials responses in the octreotide arm.

An interim analysis of overall survival data showed 13 deaths had occurred among patients assigned 177Lutetium-DOTATATE compared with 22 in the octreotide group (P = .0186); however, Strosberg noted that in an interim analysis the threshold for statistical significance is .001, meaning this difference is not significant, but is suggestive of an improvement in overall survival.

Commenting on these results Smitha Krishnamurthi, MD, ASCO Spokesperson and the moderator of the presscast said, “Lutetium DOTATATE showed impressive ability to slow the growth of midgut neuroendocrine tumors that progressed on somatostatin analogue therapy. Also notable was that Lutetium DOTATATE resulted in a response rate of 18% in these tumors which are typically unresponsive to systemic therapy.”

Recent Videos
212Pb-DOTAMTATE showed “unexpectedly good” outcomes among those with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, said Mary Maluccio, MD, MPH, FACS.
Mandating additional immunotherapy infusions may help replenish T cells and enhance tumor penetration for solid tumors, including GI malignancies.
Receiving information regarding tumor-associated antigens or mutational statuses from biopsies may help treatment selection in GI malignancies.
Better defining which patients with GI cancers are preferred candidates for adoptive cellular therapies may help optimize outcomes.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Related Content