Matthew D. Galsky, MD, on How Data in Neoadjuvant Therapy May Inform Future Research Across Tumor Types

Video

CancerNetwork® spoke with Matthew D. Galsky, MD, during the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021 to discuss leading data to come out of the meeting and what it means for the future of cancer systemic therapy.

CancerNetwork® sat down with Matthew D. Galsky, MD, to discuss some of the data to come out of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2021 that offer the greatest promise to the cancer treatment paradigm going forward. Interestingly, Galsky cited data regarding neoadjuvant therapy in the lung cancer setting as a promising indicator for future research in the genitourinary space.

Transcription:

One of the more interesting findings from a genitourinary oncologist’s standpoint is an observation from a lung cancer study that [looked at] neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint blockade. [It showed] with the combination of immune checkpoint blockade plus chemotherapy a much higher pathologic complete response rate compared with chemotherapy alone. Again, that reinforces this concept of whether what we’re observing in metastatic urothelial cancer is a function of the chemotherapy backbone or that lung cancer and bladder cancer are just very different diseases, and we won’t see the same thing.

But the reason that the neoadjuvant lung cancer study is important to us in the field is that we have a number of ongoing neoadjuvant studies combining cisplatin-based chemotherapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. If that is a hint of what we might see in bladder cancer as well, where the chemotherapy backbone in the neoadjuvant study is homogeneous and there isn’t this issue of carboplatin, hopefully we’ll see similar results in bladder cancer because we haven’t had new neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in this disease in decades.

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content