Measuring Objective Taste Changes in Head and Neck Cancer Population After RT

Commentary
Video

Noah S. Kalman, MD, MBA, describes the rationale for using a test to measure granular details of taste change in patients undergoing radiotherapy for HNC.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Noah S. Kalman, MD, MBA, discussed the background of a study evaluating the extent of taste changes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. This study was presented at the 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting.

Kalman, a radiation oncologist specializing in the treatment of gynecologic, head and neck, thoracic and pediatric cancers, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, and sarcoma at Miami Cancer Institute of Baptist Health Medical Group, noted that current methods of assessing taste changes in this population may rely on subjective interpretation. As part of this prospective study, Kalman and coinvestigators employed a test designed to evaluate granular details of taste changes before, during, and after radiotherapy on a more objective basis.

Investigators of this study used the Waterless Empirical Taste Test to determine a concentration threshold for the 5 basic tastes: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami. Patients received cellulose pads containing different taste concentrations as part of recording their perceived tastes, with responses being compared with a scoring key. Analysis of taste changes included assessments at baseline, 2 weeks thereafter, 4 weeks during radiotherapy, the end of radiotherapy, and at 12 weeks following radiotherapy.

Transcript:

We have an interest in taste changes in these patients who are getting head and neck radiation because it is a very common [adverse] effect of treatment. Early on in a patient’s radiation course, patients will have loss of taste and changes in their taste, and this both affects their quality of life and can also lead to weight loss and increased difficulty with tolerating their treatment. Unlike some of the other common radiation [adverse] effects for head and neck cancers, taste changes are not that well understood. Currently, the way we grade toxicities regarding taste is very subjective. It’s usually graded as either no change, mild change, or significant change. That can lead to some differences in interpretation and a lot of difficulties in trying to tease out smaller differences that may be present. In our current study, we used an objective taste test to score how well patients were tasting before treatment, during treatment, and then afterwards. Our goal is to get much more granular detail on changes in taste during treatment and get results that are objective instead of subjective.

Reference

Yarlagadda S, Alzmanzar A, Rubens M, Kalman N. Taste changes in patients receiving head and neck radiation – initial analysis from a prospective study. Presented at: 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting; September 29-October 2, 2024; Washington, DC. Abstract 3762.

Recent Videos
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Related Content