Mitigating CNS Events Is “Key” With Lorlatinib for ALK-Positive NSCLC

Commentary
Video

Most central nervous system events with lorlatinib were grade 1 or 2 in the phase 3 CROWN trial.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD, about important considerations for managing central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in patients who receive lorlatinib (Lorbrena) for ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). She highlighted these strategies in the context of 5-year progression-free survival data from the phase 3 CROWN trial (NCT03052608) presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

Although CNS adverse effects were not unexpected toxicities, Nagasaka, an associate clinical professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology and Oncology at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) School of Medicine of UCI Health, stated that most of these events were grade 1 or 2 in the CROWN trial. With these data in mind, she described how only a portion of patients may require treatment interruptions or reductions to mitigate CNS toxicities. She concluded that it is crucial to counsel patients and their family members on the likelihood of CNS toxicities during treatment with lorlatinib.

Transcript:

As far as the toxicities go, many of us are not so much concerned with hyperlipidemia but much more concerned with the potential CNS toxicities when using lorlatinib. However, that was not an unexpected toxicity. We have seen some CNS toxicity events from earlier studies using lorlatinib. It’s important to note that most of the CNS adverse events were grade 1 or 2, and the majority of patients, 58%, did not require any medical intervention or any intervention at all. They were able to continue the drug at the same dose, and the CNS [adverse] effects subsided on their own. It is only a portion of the patients who receive lorlatinib who have a CNS toxicity that needs to be managed with either a drug hold or drug reduction. But they are still there, and it’s important to make sure we don’t miss these patients. Counseling patients and family members on the possibility of these CNS toxicities remains key.

Reference

Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, et al. Lorlatinib vs crizotinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer: five-year progression-free survival and safety from the CROWN study. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA8503.

Recent Videos
Current findings from the phase 1/2 CaDAnCe-101 trial show no predictive factors of improved responses with BGB-16673 in patients with CLL or SLL.
Breast oncologist Jade E. Jones, MD, says she tries to send patients with BRCA-mutant HR-positive TNBC to clinical trials that use PARP inhibitors.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Following progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor, ascertaining the endocrine sensitivity of HR-positive/HER2-negative disease may inform sequential treatment.
T-DXd improved progression-free survival over standard chemotherapy among patients with HR-positive/triple-negative breast cancer in DESTINY-Breast04.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
More follow-up data will better elucidate the impact of frontline use of hypomethylating agents in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Related Content