Mitigating CNS Events Is “Key” With Lorlatinib for ALK-Positive NSCLC

Commentary
Video

Most central nervous system events with lorlatinib were grade 1 or 2 in the phase 3 CROWN trial.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD, about important considerations for managing central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in patients who receive lorlatinib (Lorbrena) for ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). She highlighted these strategies in the context of 5-year progression-free survival data from the phase 3 CROWN trial (NCT03052608) presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

Although CNS adverse effects were not unexpected toxicities, Nagasaka, an associate clinical professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology and Oncology at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) School of Medicine of UCI Health, stated that most of these events were grade 1 or 2 in the CROWN trial. With these data in mind, she described how only a portion of patients may require treatment interruptions or reductions to mitigate CNS toxicities. She concluded that it is crucial to counsel patients and their family members on the likelihood of CNS toxicities during treatment with lorlatinib.

Transcript:

As far as the toxicities go, many of us are not so much concerned with hyperlipidemia but much more concerned with the potential CNS toxicities when using lorlatinib. However, that was not an unexpected toxicity. We have seen some CNS toxicity events from earlier studies using lorlatinib. It’s important to note that most of the CNS adverse events were grade 1 or 2, and the majority of patients, 58%, did not require any medical intervention or any intervention at all. They were able to continue the drug at the same dose, and the CNS [adverse] effects subsided on their own. It is only a portion of the patients who receive lorlatinib who have a CNS toxicity that needs to be managed with either a drug hold or drug reduction. But they are still there, and it’s important to make sure we don’t miss these patients. Counseling patients and family members on the possibility of these CNS toxicities remains key.

Reference

Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, et al. Lorlatinib vs crizotinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer: five-year progression-free survival and safety from the CROWN study. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA8503.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Related Content