Mutational status affects nilotinib responses in CP-CML

News
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 2
Volume 17
Issue 2

In a significant proportion of imatinib (Gleevec)-resistant chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia patients with Bcr-Abl mutations, nilotinib (Tasigna) treatment results in hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses

ATLANTA—In a significant proportion of imatinib (Gleevec)-resistant chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia patients with Bcr-Abl mutations, nilotinib (Tasigna) treatment results in hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses, Timothy P. Hughes, MD, of the Hanson Institute, Adelaide, Australia, said at ASH 2007 (abstract 320).

Nilotinib is active against most Bcr-Abl mutations, with the exception of T3151.

The mutational analysis included 275 Philadelphia chromosome positive CP-CML patients: 68% imatinib resistant and 32% imatinib intolerant. Overall, 41% of patients had baseline Bcr-Abl mutations: 10% of imatinib-intolerant patients and 56% of imatinib-resistant patients.

Among baseline mutations, 13% were in less nilotinib-sensitive mutation groups (IC50 > 150 nM). Three percent in the T3151 group (IC50 > 10,000 nM) were excluded from analysis.

Reporting best responses at 12 months, Dr. Hughes said that clinical efficacy for nilotinib was seen in both the mutation and nonmutation groups. Responses were higher for patients with no mutation vs any mutation: Complete hematological responses (81% vs 71%), major cytogenetic responses (60% vs 50%), complete cytogenetic responses (CCyRs, 42% vs 32%), and major molecular responses (25% vs 21%).

Among patients with the less sensitive mutations, there were no CCyRs. On the other hand, response rates were comparable in patients without baseline mutations and with more sensitive mutations (IC50 ≤ 150 nM). Newly detectable mutations during therapy were found in 28% and 13% of imatinib-resistant patients with and without baseline mutations, respectively, and in 11% and 3%, respectively, of imatinib-intolerant patients.

Among 42 progressing patients, 31% had no baseline mutation, 33% had the same mutation as at baseline, and 36% had a newly detectable mutation.

Dr. Hughes concluded, "CP-CML patients without baseline mutations and those with mutations of IC50 ≤ 150 nM have similar response rates and progression with nilotinib while those with IC50 > 150 nM have lower response rates and higher risk of progression."

He commented that a larger data set and longer follow-up are needed to validate these findings.

Recent Videos
Both clinicians and patients should have as much information as possible to participate in shared decision-making for CLL care, says Jacob D. Soumerai, MD.
Sequencing different treatments in the first 3 lines of therapy represents a challenge in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Deborah Stephens, DO.
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Related Content