Nab-Sirolimus Regimens Show Promise in HR+/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Fact checked by" Roman Fabbricatore
News
Article

Data from a phase 2 study may support a novel mTOR inhibitor-based regimen in previously treated, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

"The novel mTOR inhibitor-based regimen may address the unmet need in CDK4/6 [inhibitor]-failed [HR-positive, HER2-negative] advanced breast cancer," according to the study authors.

"The novel mTOR inhibitor-based regimen may address the unmet need in CDK4/6 [inhibitor]-failed [HR-positive, HER2-negative] advanced breast cancer," according to the study authors.

Combining the targeted mTOR inhibitor nab-sirolimus (HB1901) with endocrine therapy exhibited promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile among patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, according to data from a phase 2 trial (NCT06957379) presented in a poster session at the 2025 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS).1

Among patients who received nab-sirolimus in combination with fulvestrant (Faslodex; n = 31) and exemestane (Aromasin; n = 29), the overall response rate (ORR) was 29% and 10.3%, respectively, yielding an ORR of 20% across the overall population (n = 60). In the fulvestrant and exemestane cohorts, the disease control rate (DCR) was 93.5% and 82.8%, and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 45.2% and 20.7%.

Among patients with PIK3CA-, AKT-, or PTEN-mutant disease (n = 11) or wild-type disease (n = 20) in the fulvestrant cohort, data showed an ORR of 27.3% and 30.0%, respectively. Partial responses (PRs) occurred in 27.3% and 30.0% of each group. Additionally, the DCRs were 100.0% and 90.0%, and the CBRs were 72.7% and 65.0%.

The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 58.3% with nab-sirolimus plus fulvestrant compared with 39.9% with nab-sirolimus plus exemestane. In the PI3K/AKT/mTOR mutant and wild-type subgroups of patients who received nab-sirolimus plus fulvestrant, the 6-month PFS rates were 70.1% vs 52.6%, respectively; the median PFS in each group was 9.1 months (95% CI, 3.75-not evaluable [NE]) and 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.40-9.20).

“Nab-sirolimus exhibited manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity, particularly when combined with fulvestrant (achieving an ORR of 29% and a median PFS of [7.4] months),” lead study author Fei Ma, from the Medical Oncology Department of China Cancer Institute and Hospital in Beijing, China, wrote with coauthors in the poster.1 “The novel mTOR inhibitor-based regimen may address the unmet need in CDK4/6 [inhibitor]-failed [HR-positive, HER2-negative] advanced breast cancer.”

In the phase 2 trial, 34 patients who progressed on prior aromatase inhibitors with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors were assigned to receive nab-sirolimus plus fulvestrant, while 31 patients who progressed on previous fulvestrant with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors received nab-sirolimus plus exemestane. All patients received nab-sirolimus at 100 mg/m2.

The trial’s primary end points were the 6-month PFS rate and safety. Secondary end points included PFS, ORR, CBR, and overall survival.

Patients 18 years and older with pathologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, no more than 3 prior lines of chemotherapy for inoperable locally advanced or metastatic disease, and at least 1 measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1 criteria were eligible for enrollment on the trial.2 Other eligibility criteria included having an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, a life expectancy of at least 3 months, and adequate organ and bone marrow function.

Across the overall population, 64.6% of patients were postmenopausal, and 46.2% received 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. Additionally, most patients had an ECOG performance status of 1 or higher (60.0%), prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (98.5%), and visceral metastases (78.5%). Overall, 36.9% of patients had PIK3CA, AKT, or PTEN mutations.

Any-grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) occurred in 98.5% of the population, with 40% experiencing grade 3 or higher events. One patient in the fulvestrant cohort discontinued study therapy due to an AE; there were no drug-related toxicities that resulted in death.

At least 1 grade 3 or higher AE occurred in 38.2% of patients in the fulvestrant cohort and 41.9% of those in the exemestane cohort. In each respective cohort, the most common grade 3 or higher toxicities included hypokalemia (23.5% vs 9.7%), hypertriglyceridemia (14.7% vs 6.5%), decreased neutrophil counts (2.9% vs 6.5%), and hyperglycemia (0% vs 6.5%).

References

  1. Ma F, Zhang Q, Mo H, et al. A multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of nab-sirolimus (HB1901) plus endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer following standard therapy failure. Presented at: 2025 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 9-12, 2025; San Antonio, TX. Abstract 911.
  2. Sirolimus for injection (Albumin-bound) in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/​HER2- advanced/​metastatic breast cancer patients who have failed standard therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated May 4, 2025. Accessed December 23, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/2rrz7zfp
Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Related Content