Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Around the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Navigators, Reminders May Improve Follow-Up After Positive Fecal Blood Test

October 12, 2017
By Leah Lawrence
Article

Follow-up intervention by patient navigators or provider reminders may help to improve the number of patients who undergo colonoscopy after positive fecal blood test results.

Follow-up intervention by patient navigators or provider reminders may help to improve the number of patients who undergo colonoscopy after positive fecal blood test results, according to the results of a review published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“Timely diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive fecal test result is a critical step on the colorectal cancer screening continuum,” wrote Kevin Selby, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Division of Research in Oakland, California, and colleagues. “Although research has primarily focused on screening completion, fecal testing will not be effective if positive results are not followed.”

With this review, Selby and colleagues evaluated interventions that could improve follow-up rates after positive fecal blood tests. They reviewed 23 studies that reported data from an intervention for colonoscopy follow-up of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal test results. The studies included seven randomized and 16 nonrandomized studies.

Much of the research was of low-quality, the researchers noted, particularly with regard to system-level interventions, such as automated referral, patient registries, and quality improvement efforts. However, the study did reveal moderate evidence that supported the implementation of patient- and provider-level interventions.

The evidence suggested that the use of patient navigators, or individuals who work with patients to counsel and guide them through the barriers associated with cancer care, can increase rates of follow-up colonoscopy. The review included five studies of patient navigation interventions. One study compared usual care with or without the addition of a registered nurse patients navigator. Use of a navigator to help with logistic barriers and to conduct motivational interview resulted in a non-significant but clinically relevant increase in the number of patients completing colonoscopies.

“Patient navigators can provide one-on-one education and individualized reduction of structural barriers,” the researchers wrote. “Cost may be a limiting factor, however: An economic evaluation concluded that patient navigation for the follow-up of abnormal results on cancer screening tests costs an additional $275 per patient (CI, $260 to $290).”

Provider-level interventions that utilize electronic reminders to alert physicians of patients who have not taken adequate action after a positive test result were shown to improve colonoscopy completion from 9 to 25 percentage points.

Based on these results, the researchers concluded that “more research is needed given the critical role of the diagnostic resolution of positive test results in fecal blood-based screening.”

Recent Videos
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
Related Content
Advertisement

A total of 34 patients were included in the efficacy analysis; all received 320 mg of atebimetinib once daily plus 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 125 mg/m2 of nab-paclitaxel.

Atebimetinib Plus SOC Chemo Improves Survival/Safety in 1L PDAC

Tim Cortese
September 25th 2025
Article

Atebimetinib with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel achieved a 9-month OS and PFS of 86% and 53%, respectively, in patients with pancreatic cancer in frontline settings.


Benjamin Golas, MD, discusses how the use of PIPAC may work in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy for those with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Harnessing PIPAC to Improve Outcomes in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Benjamin J. Golas, MD
June 30th 2025
Podcast

Benjamin Golas, MD, discusses how the use of PIPAC may work in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy for those with peritoneal carcinomatosis.


analysis of biomarkers associated with outcomes from the trial was presented.3 The biomarker analysis demonstrated that intratumoral myeloid cells and T cells were activated in responding patients.

Mitazalimab/Chemo Yields Promising Survival/Responses in Untreated PDAC

Tim Cortese
September 22nd 2025
Article

At 30 months, mitazalimab plus mFOLFIRINOX achieved an OS rate of 21% in patients with previously untreated metastatic PDAC.


The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.

Sotorasib Combo Approval May Address Novel Therapy Need in KRAS G12C+ CRC

Marwan G. Fakih, MD
February 24th 2025
Podcast

The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.


Favorable survival outcomes were identified, overall, in the wild-type and GOF groups vs the non-GOF group.

P53 Mutations May Reveal Viability of Different Pancreatic Cancer Therapies

Tim Cortese
September 20th 2025
Article

Patients with PDAC and non-GOF mutations had less favorable OS and DFS outcomes in various instances compared with those who had wild-type or GOF mutations.


An independent data monitoring committee recommended the continuation of the phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trial evaluating ELI-002 7P in PDAC in August 2025.

ELI-002 7P Elicits T Cell Responses in Mutant KRAS-Driven Tumors

Roman Fabbricatore
September 18th 2025
Article

An independent data monitoring committee recommended the continuation of the phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trial evaluating ELI-002 7P in PDAC in August 2025.

Related Content
Advertisement

A total of 34 patients were included in the efficacy analysis; all received 320 mg of atebimetinib once daily plus 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 125 mg/m2 of nab-paclitaxel.

Atebimetinib Plus SOC Chemo Improves Survival/Safety in 1L PDAC

Tim Cortese
September 25th 2025
Article

Atebimetinib with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel achieved a 9-month OS and PFS of 86% and 53%, respectively, in patients with pancreatic cancer in frontline settings.


Benjamin Golas, MD, discusses how the use of PIPAC may work in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy for those with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Harnessing PIPAC to Improve Outcomes in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Benjamin J. Golas, MD
June 30th 2025
Podcast

Benjamin Golas, MD, discusses how the use of PIPAC may work in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy for those with peritoneal carcinomatosis.


analysis of biomarkers associated with outcomes from the trial was presented.3 The biomarker analysis demonstrated that intratumoral myeloid cells and T cells were activated in responding patients.

Mitazalimab/Chemo Yields Promising Survival/Responses in Untreated PDAC

Tim Cortese
September 22nd 2025
Article

At 30 months, mitazalimab plus mFOLFIRINOX achieved an OS rate of 21% in patients with previously untreated metastatic PDAC.


The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.

Sotorasib Combo Approval May Address Novel Therapy Need in KRAS G12C+ CRC

Marwan G. Fakih, MD
February 24th 2025
Podcast

The approval of sotorasib plus panitumumab is a “welcome step” in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer, according to Marwan G. Fakih, MD.


Favorable survival outcomes were identified, overall, in the wild-type and GOF groups vs the non-GOF group.

P53 Mutations May Reveal Viability of Different Pancreatic Cancer Therapies

Tim Cortese
September 20th 2025
Article

Patients with PDAC and non-GOF mutations had less favorable OS and DFS outcomes in various instances compared with those who had wild-type or GOF mutations.


An independent data monitoring committee recommended the continuation of the phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trial evaluating ELI-002 7P in PDAC in August 2025.

ELI-002 7P Elicits T Cell Responses in Mutant KRAS-Driven Tumors

Roman Fabbricatore
September 18th 2025
Article

An independent data monitoring committee recommended the continuation of the phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trial evaluating ELI-002 7P in PDAC in August 2025.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.