NeuroSAFE Improves Erectile Function, Urinary Continence in Prostate Cancer

Fact checked by" Russ Conroy
News
Article

The adverse effect profile was similar among patients with prostate cancer using NeuroSAFE-assisted RARP vs standard RARP.

The adverse effect profile was similar among patients with prostate cancer using NeuroSAFE-assisted RARP vs standard RARP.

“Prostate cancer surgery is a life-saving option for lots of [patients], but it’s a major procedure that can cause [adverse] effects [such as] erection problems,” Matthew Hobbs, MD, director of Research at Prostate Cancer UK, said in a news release.

NeuroSAFE-guided nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) improved patient-reported 12-month International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)–5 scores and short-term urinary continence, according to results from the phase 3 NeuroSAFE PROOF (NCT03317990) trial published in The Lancet Oncology.1

At a median follow-up of 12.3 months (IQR, 11.8-12.7), efficacy data from the trial revealed that the mean IIEF-5 scores were significantly higher in patients undergoing surgery with NeuroSAFE at 12.7 (SD, 8.0) vs 9.7 (SD, 7.5) in those who underwent standard RARP (adjusted mean difference, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.62-4.75; P <.0001). Additionally, a similar benefit was seen in IIEF-6 scores: 15.3 (SD, 9.7) vs 11.5 (SD, 9.0) in each respective population (adjusted mean difference, 3.92; 95% CI, 2.01-5.83; P <.0001).

Patients in the NeuroSAFE group saw significant decreases in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) scores. The 3-month ICIQ scores among the NeuroSAFE and standard RARP groups were 5.8 (SD, 4.1) and 7.4 (SD, 5.2), respectively (adjusted mean difference, –1.41; 95% CI, –2.42 to –0.41; P = .006). Additionally, at 6 months, scores were 4.5 (SD, 4.2) and 5.1 (SD, 4.7) in the respective groups (adjusted mean difference, –0.37; 95% CI, –1.35 to 0.62; P = .46).

“Prostate cancer surgery is a life-saving option for lots of [patients], but it’s a major procedure that can cause [adverse] effects [AEs, such as] erection problems,” Matthew Hobbs, MD, director of Research at Prostate Cancer UK, said in a news release.2 “A major challenge we face is how to cure [patients] but also ensure they can live life to the [fullest] afterwards. This study is promising and provides evidence that innovative types of surgery can reduce erectile dysfunction in some [patients]. However, more research is needed to prove whether NeuroSAFE is as effective as traditional techniques at delivering a complete cure.”

Patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer eligible for RARP were randomly assigned to receive NeuroSAFE-based RARP (n = 204) or standard RARP (n = 203). Standard RARP was performed by an experienced RARP surgeon using the DaVinci surgical system per NHS standard-of-care protocol.

Patients receiving NeuroSAFE-based RARP underwent initial postero-lateral dissection followed by prostate extraction. Then, segments from the dissection were snap frozen, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin before examination by a consultant genitourinary histopathologist. The margins were considered negative if the sides of a section were free of prostate cancer cells.

In the event of positive margins, a secondary resection was recommended if: more than 1 section was positive; there was a prostate cancer Gleason grade 4 pattern or higher; or more than 2 mm of Gleason grade 3 pattern was observed in a single section of an inked margin. Secondary resections encompassed a full excision of the entire ipsilateral neuro-vascular bundle.

The primary end point of the study was erectile function at 12 months assessed by IIEF-5. Secondary end points included the difference in ICIQ scores at 3 and 6 months, and the difference in IIEF-6 scores. Exploratory end points included time from surgery to erectile function recovery, time to urinary continence recovery, and positive surgical margin rates.

The 12-month rates of IIEF-5 scores of 21 or greater were 20% in the NeuroSAFE group vs 14% in the standard RARP group. Additionally, 39% vs 23% of the respective groups had no or mild erectile dysfunction at 12 months. Furthermore, small positive margins were observed in 21% vs 13%, respectively, and large or multifocal positive margins were observed in 14% vs 16%.

A total of 4% of patients in the NeuroSAFE group and 3% of the standard RARP group experienced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence. In the respective groups, 6% and 4% experienced biochemical recurrence, and 4% and 1% underwent adjuvant treatment.

There were 20 AEs and 6 serious AEs observed in the NeuroSAFE group (n = 182) and 25 AEs and 5 serious AEs in the standard RARP group (n = 188). In the standard RARP group, 1 patient experienced 2 serious AEs. A total of 4 patients died within 12 months of surgery: 2 in the NeuroSAFE group due to myocardial infarction and co-occurring cancer and 2 in the standard RARP group due to co-occurring cancer and an unknown cause, with none considered related to prostate cancer or surgery.

References

  1. Dinneen E, Almeida-Magana R, Al-Hammouri T, et al. Effect of NeuroSAFE-guided RARP versus standard RARP on erectile function and urinary continence in patients with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. Published online March 24, 2025. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00091-9
  2. Sample I. Prostate cancer surgery breakthrough offers hope for erectile function. News release. The Guardian. March 24, 2025. Accessed March 24, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/3us729ha
Recent Videos
Standardizing surgical outcomes and better training oncologic surgeons may be accomplished through the use of AI.
The poly-ICLC trial seeks to develop a delivery mechanism to prostate cancer through different biomarkers.
Ablative technology may generate an immune response that can be enhanced via injected immunotherapy in patients with solid tumors.
A phase 1 trial assessed the use of PSCA-directed CAR T cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Findings from a phase 1 study may inform future trial designs intended to yield longer responses with PSCA-targeted CAR T cells.
A phase 1 trial assessed the use of PSCA-directed CAR T cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Two women in genitourinary oncology discuss their experiences with figuring out when to begin a family and how to prioritize both work and children.
Over the past few decades, the prostate cancer space has evolved with increased funding for clinical trial creation and enrollment.
Related Content