New Combined Therapies for Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 8
Volume 14
Issue 8

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere) and vinorelbine (Navelbine), every 15 days, in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere) and vinorelbine (Navelbine), every 15 days, in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study between December 1998 and January 1999. Their average age was 53.9 years (range: 29–72 years). Treatment consisted of docetaxel 60 mg/m² IV day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m² IV day 1, every 15 days. If there was grade 3/4 neutropenia, we added prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim [Neupogen]).

Metastatic locations included breast (8 patients), bone (21), local chest wall (10), liver (16), node (10), lung and pleural effusion (9), lymphangitis (4), bone marrow (1), and peritoneal carcinomatosis (1). All patients had been treated previously with anthracyclines, 28 had received previous hormonotherapy, and 24 previous radiotherapy. Thirty-four patients were evaluable for clinical response.

Results were as follows: complete response, 2 patients (5.8%) (1 dermal lesion and 1 lung); partial response, 16 (47%); overall response, 18 (52.8%). We used prophylactic G-CSF in 80 cycles. Hematologic toxicity occurred in 209 cycles (without G-CSF): neutropenia (grade 1, 7.6%; grade 2, 10.5%; grade 3, 21.5%; grade 4, 7.6%) and neutropenic fever (22 episodes). Nonhematologic toxicity was seen in 289 cycles: dermal toxicity (grade 1, 2.4%, grade 2, 2.0%); paresthesias (grade 1, 2.0%; grade 2, 4.1%); conjunctivitis (4.8%); edemas (3 patients); asthenia (18.3%); constipation (2.7%); and alopecia (100%). There was one toxic death due to neutropenic enterocolitis and one anaphylactic reaction.

CONCLUSION: This is an effective combination. Hematologic toxicity was moderate; thus it is necessary to use prophylactic G-CSF.

Click here for Dr. Gabriel N. Hortobagyi’s commentary on this abstract.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content