New Model Can Assess Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Atypical Hyperplasia

Article

Researchers have developed a new model to help predict the development of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia based on a breast biopsy.

Researchers have developed a new model to help predict the development of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) based on a breast biopsy.

With approximately 10% of benign breast biopsies demonstrating AH, there are about 100,000 women newly diagnosed with AH in the United States each year. “As a group, women with AH have an approximate four-fold increase in risk compared with the general population, which translates to an absolute risk of 1% to 2% per year,” wrote study authors led by Amy C. Degnim, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. “Because clinical management decisions, such as screening and prevention therapies, are made for individual women, a tool that provides accurate individualized risk prediction in the AH setting is needed.”

The researchers created a risk prediction model specifically for women with AH; the women included were aged 18 to 85 years and had pathologically confirmed benign AH. The model-building cohort included 699 women with AH, 142 of whom developed breast cancer (median follow-up, 8.1 years), while a validation cohort included another 461 women with AH, of whom 114 later developed breast cancer (median follow-up, 11.4 years). The final model, which they termed the AH-BC model, included age at biopsy, age at biopsy squared, and the number of AH foci. The results of the analysis were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In the model-building set, at 10 years, the model demonstrated good discrimination (0.63 [95% CI, 0.57–0.70]) and calibration (0.87 [95% CI, 0.66–1.24]). The ratio of predicted cancers to observed cancers at 5, 10, and 20 years was 0.96, 0.87, and 0.92, respectively.

In the validation cohort, the researchers wrote that the model showed “acceptable” discrimination (0.59 [95% CI, 0.51–0.67]) and calibration (0.91 [95% CI, 0.65–1.42]). At 5 years, the AH-BC model over-predicted the number of cancers, with a ratio of 1.46, but it was better calibrated at 10 years (observed-to-predicted ratio of 0.91) and at 20 years (ratio of 1.02).

“Accurate risk prediction for women with AH is important because clinical management can be refined on the basis of risk level,” the authors wrote. “This model is an important step in improving risk prediction for women with AH.”

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content