Nina Shah, MD, Reviews the Rationale for Phase 2 KarMMa Trial Sub-Analysis of Ide-Cel CR Correlates in R/R Multiple Myeloma

Video

Nina Shah, MD, spoke about analyzing correlates of complete response in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were treated with idecabtagene vicleucel.

At the 2022 Tandem Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Nina Shah, MD, a hematologist oncologist from University of California, San Francisco Health, about the reasoning behind conducting the phase 2 KarMMA trial (NCT03361748) which analyzed idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; Abecma) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received 4 or more lines of therapy. In particular, the study focuses on correlates of complete response (CR) to ide-cel.

Transcript:

We recently performed a sub-analysis of the KarMMA study looking at patients who achieved a CR or not. Now to recap, the patients who [achieved] a CR did very well as far as PFS [progression-free survival] goes. We wanted to better understand what it was about those patients that allowed them [to achieve] or was correlated with achieving a CR which correlated with higher PFS. We performed an analysis of baseline correlatives of CR, to bb2121 or ide-cel, to understand how we might be able to select patients better.

Reference

Shah N, Munshi N, Berdeja JG, et al. Baseline correlates of complete response to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a BCMA-directed CAR T cell therapy in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): subanalysis of the KarMMa trial. Presented at the 2022 Tandem Meetings; April 22-26, 2022; Salt Lake City, UT. Poster 223.

Recent Videos
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
Related Content