Non-GCB DLBCL May Benefit Most From Immunochemotherapy

News
Article

Non-germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL patients derived the most benefit from treatment with the immunochemotherapy regimen R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP.

Micrograph of DLBCL, lymph node FNA specimen, field stain; source: Nephron, Wikimedia Commons

The added survival benefit in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) when treated with the immunochemotherapy regimen R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP may be related to the non-germinal center B-cell (GCB)-like subtype, according to the results of a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology

Thierry Jo Molina, MD, PhD, Hôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants-Malades, Université Paris Descartes, and colleagues came to this conclusion by conducting a biomarker analysis of patients in the LNH 03-2B trial. Results of the LNH 03-2B trial showed that treatment with R-ACVBP (rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone) in addition to subsequent consolidation improved survival in patients with low-intermediate risk DLBCL compared to treatment with R-CHOP.

“At a time when ongoing phase III trials are aiming to improve R-CHOP by adding lenalidomide or a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor to the treatment regimen for non-GCB patients, the observation of increased survival in this specific population when using a conventional regimen such as R-ACVBP could offer an attractive comparison,” Molina and colleagues wrote.

The researchers used immunohistochemistry to examine several tumor biomarkers- CD10, BCL6, MUM1, MYC, NCL2, and co-expression of MYC/BCL2-in 329 patients from the LNH 03-2B trial. They also classified 229 tumor samples using the Hans algorithm as GCB (n = 128) or non-GCB (n = 101).

The only significant interaction found between a biomarker and survival was between the Hans algorithm and the treatment arm for progression-free and overall survival. Those patients with non-GCB DLBCL treated with R-CHOP were found to have worse progression-free survival (HR = 3.21; 95% CI, 1.29-8.00) and overall survival (HR = 6.09; 95% CI, 1.37-27.03) compared with patients treated with the R-ACVBP regimen. Progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer in patients with non-GCB DLBCL who were treated with R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP.

No differences in survival between regimens were found for patients with GCB DLBCL.

“The better survival observed in this study among patients with non-GCB tumors when treated with R-ACVBP compared with R-CHOP suggests that oncogenic events specific to non-GCB tumor cells, the hallmark being nuclear factor-κB activation, can be better targeted with R-ACVBP and a consolidation regimen than with R-CHOP,” the researchers wrote.

Recent Videos
Educating community practices on CAR T referral and sequencing treatment strategies may help increase CAR T utilization.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
No evidence indicates synergistic toxicity when combining radiation with CAR T-cell therapy in this population, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
The addition of radiotherapy to CAR T-cell therapy may particularly benefit patients with localized disease, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD, discusses how radiation may play a role as bridging therapy to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
Pallawi Torka, MD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Pallawi Torka, MD, with the Oncology Brothers presenting slides
Related Content