ODAC Declines to Recommend Approval of Eloxatin

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 4
Volume 9
Issue 4

BETHESDA, Md-The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) declined to vote on whether to recommend that the Food and Drug Administration approve Eloxatin (oxaliplatin, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy.

BETHESDA, Md—The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) declined to vote on whether to recommend that the Food and Drug Administration approve Eloxatin (oxaliplatin, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy.

The panel passed up a formal vote after it decided unanimously that a key study presented by the company failed to demonstrate “persuasively” a survival advantage for Eloxatin.

The company submitted two phase III trials conducted in Europe, two second-line trials, and four monotherapy trials in support of its application. The FDA, however, only accepted the two multinational, randomized phase III trials (420 and 200 patients, respectively) for review.

Both studies compared 5–FU/leucovorin to 5–FU/leucovorin plus Eloxatin and made overall survival a secondary endpoint. ODAC has long regarded survival as the fundamental basis for recommending approval of drugs for the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer.

The FDA medical review team concluded that both randomized trials showed an “increased response rate and progression-free survival with the addition of oxaliplatin,” but neither showed “a survival advantage.”

In material provided to the advisory committee, the FDA argued that the addition of Eloxatin to 5-FU/leucovorin in the pivotal study presented by Sanofi “did not demonstrate a survival advantage employing the log rank test specified in the protocol as the planned method for analysis.”

The company provided an alternative adjusted analysis that it contended demonstrated a survival advantage for the combination of Eloxatin and 5-FU/leucovorin. The principal adjustment in the alternative analysis was for baseline alkaline phosphatase.

ODAC members did not accept the company’s alternative analysis. One panel member, Richard M. Simon, DSc, chief of the National Cancer Institute’s Biometric Research Branch, said that the analysis “violated many of the basic principles of statistical practice.”

Recent Videos
Taletrectinib showed improved efficacy in patients with ROS1-positive non–small cell lung cancer who were treatment-naïve.
“It’s a drug that I’m very comfortable with, and it is a drug I’ll likely use primarily in the first-line setting,” stated Jorge Nieva, MD, on taletrectinib in non–small cell lung cancer.
4 experts in this video
4 experts in this video
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.