Olaparib Looks Promising in Treatment of Non-BRCA Ovarian Cancer

Article

Researchers at the BC Cancer Agency in Vancouver and colleagues have just published the results of a phase II study showing that olaparib (AZD2281), an oral PARP inhibitor, may be effective in treating non-BRCA-related ovarian cancer patients.

Researchers at the BC Cancer Agency in Vancouver and colleagues have just published the results of a phase II study showing that olaparib (AZD2281), an oral PARP inhibitor, may be effective in treating non-BRCA–related ovarian cancer patients. The research was published in the Lancet Oncology on August 22, 2011 ( DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70214-5).

The Background

Chemical structure of olaparib

It’s widely understood that carriers of mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are at elevated risk of cancer; by age 70 the risk of breast cancer in this group is 50% to 87% greater, and the risk of ovarian cancer is 10% to 40% greater. Additionally, women with these mutations often present with ovarian cancer at a later disease stage-more than 70% present at stage III or IV. 

Olaparib has previously been shown effective in a phase I study with an expanded cohort of BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers with ovarian cancer-follow-up phase II studies also confirmed the effectiveness of olaparib, with response rates of 41% (11 of 27 patients) in a group of patients with advanced breast cancer and 33% (11 of 33 patients) in a group of patients with ovarian cancer.

The Study

The phase II study conducted by Karen Gelmon, MD and her colleagues was multicenter and non-randomized, and enrolled women with advanced, high-grade serous and/or undifferentiated ovarian cancer or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with or without the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. (Patients with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were enrolled for comparison-the results of the studies with olaparib on patients with ovarian and breast cancers carrying the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were not known at the inception of this trial.) 

The study had four cohorts: Group A consisted of patients with TNBC and either negative or unknown BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Group B included patients with advanced, recurrent breast cancer with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Group C had patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, and Group D had patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer with negative BRCA1 or BRCA2 status. 

All patients received 400mg of olaparib twice a day on a continuous basis, and the primary endpoint was objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). 

The Results

In total, 91 patients were enrolled in the four cohorts; 65 who had ovarian cancer and 26 who had breast cancer. Of the 91 patients, 90 were treated in the time span between July 2008 and September 2009. In the 63 patients with ovarian cancer who were eligible for objective response due to RECIST, confirmed response was seen in 7 of the 17 patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and 11 of the 46 who did not have these mutations. However, no objective responses were seen in any of the breast cancer patients. The most common side effects were fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and decreased appetite.

Conclusion

The study shows that olaparib is promising for women with ovarian cancer, but further clinical trials of the agent are needed.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Approximately 10% of patients discontinued treatment with avutometinib/defactinib due to toxicity in the phase 2 RAMP 201 trial.
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Related Content