Oral Agents Provide Greater Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment Diversity

Commentary
Video

Treatment with AML depends on a variety of factors, including stage of treatment, transplant eligibility, and mutational status.

Treatment for those with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on a variety of factors, according to Zahra Mahmoudjafari, PharmD, MBA, BCOP, FHOPA, which include stage of treatment, transplant eligibility, and mutational status.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Mahmoudjafari discussed standard pharmacologic options for patients being treated for AML. She began by highlighting the emergence of oral options for these patients, who historically were limited to intravenous (IV) induction therapy. Moreover, she expressed that a greater spectrum of therapeutics enables a more tailored approach, particularly among patients with specific mutational statuses.

Specifically, Mahmoudjafari expressed that oral agents available for FLT3 and IDH1/IDH2 mutations may help overcome challenges that historically emerged with a patient’s prognosis. Additionally, she explained that hypomethylating agents may better treat patients who may be unfit or ineligible for transplantation.

Mahmoudjafari is a Clinical Pharmacy Manager in the Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics at the University of Kansas Health System.

Transcript:

We have both oral and IV options. Now, traditionally, back when I was being trained, the only options that were available on the market were IV options, usually an induction. If a patient was generally fit, [and] had not been treated previously, then we would treat with a combination of cytarabine or daunorubicin that's typically given IV. But now, with time and a lot more experience, we have [many] additional options that allow us to tailor therapies to some specific mutations that patients may have.

For instance, FLT3 is a mutation that we know can cause some significant challenges to a patient’s overall prognosis. We now have oral agents that are available that treat FLT3 [mutations]. We also have IDH1 and IDH2 oral treatment options that are available as well. For patients who are a bit more elderly, who may be transplant ineligible, we have now seen more hypomethylating agents.

The treatment of AML depends on whether they are in induction, at the beginning of their treatment journey, in consolidation, and/or if they are going to transplant. The treatment regimens do vary, but we have, thankfully, both oral and IV options now.

Recent Videos
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
Related Content