Osimertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, outperforming monotherapy across various prognostic factors.
Osimertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, outperforming monotherapy across various prognostic factors.
An overall survival (OS) benefit was observed with osimertinib (Tagrisso) plus chemotherapy vs osimertinib monotherapy among patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with poor prognostic factors, according to results from an exploratory analysis of the phase 3 FLAURA2 trial (NCT04035486) presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2025.
Previously reported data from the trial’s final OS analysis showed that patients treated with osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 279) achieved a median OS of 47.5 months (95% CI, 41.0-not calculable [NC] vs 37.6 months (95% CI, 33.2-43.2) for those treated with osimertinib alone (n = 278; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96; P = .02).1,2
The exploratory analysis, examined outcomes for patients based on the following 6 prognostic factors:1
“Hazard ratios for OS favored the combination arm, regardless of baseline prognostic factors, and were consistent with the overall population,” lead study author Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD, said in a presentation of the data. Jänne is a senior physician, senior vice president for Translational Medicine, director of the Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, director of the Chen-Huang Center for EGFR Mutant Lung Cancers, and the David M. Livingston, MD, Chair at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, as well as a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.
In patients harboring CNS metastases at baseline, the median OS was 40.9 months (95% CI, 35.2-46.6) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 116) compared with 29.7 months (95% CI, 25.6-35.8) for osimertinib monotherapy (n = 110; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99). The 3-year OS rates in this subgroup were 57% (95% CI, 48%-66%) and 40% (95% CI, 31%-49%), respectively. In patients without CNS metastases at baseline, the median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 45.0-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 163) vs 43.9 months (95% CI, 37.8-53.3) for osimertinib alone (n = 168; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.57-1.05).
Patients harboring EGFR exon 21 L858R mutations treated with osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 106) achieved a median OS of 38.1 months (95% CI, 33.4-42.0) vs 32.4 months (95% CI, 28.0-37.6) for osimertinib alone (n = 107; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07). The respective 3-year OS rates were 54% (95% CI, 44%-63%) and 42% (95% CI, 32%-51%). In patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 47.2-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 172) vs 43.0 months (95% CI, 35.7-51.9) for osimertinib alone (n = 169; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.02).
Among patients with EGFR mutations detected in plasma ctDNA, the median OS was 38.4 months (95% CI, 33.2-46.6) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 148) vs 32.5 months (95% CI, 28.8-35.8) for osimertinib monotherapy (n = 161; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.03). The 3-year OS rates in this subgroup were 53% (95% CI, 45%-61%) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy vs 42% (95% CI, 35%-50%) for osimertinib alone. In patients without EGFR mutations detected in plasma ctDNA, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 50.8-NC) and NR (95% CI, 46.0-NC) for the combination (n = 65) and osimertinib monotherapy (n = 48), respectively (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.44-1.44).
In the subgroup of patients with liver metastases at baseline, osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 43) generated a median OS of 36.6 months (95% CI, 24.4-NC) compared with 28.0 months (95% CI, 21.3-32.5) for osimertinib alone (n = 66; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-1.05). The 3-year OS rates were 54% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 35% (95% CI, 24%-47%), respectively. In patients without liver metastases at baseline, the median OS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 43.0-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 236) vs 41.8 months (95% CI, 35.7-49.8) for osimertinib alone (n = 212; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.07).
For patients with bone metastases, the median OS was 40.2 months (95% CI, 33.9-47.2) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 132) vs 32.3 months (95% CI, 26.7-36.5) for osimertinib monotherapy (n = 142; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.02). The 3-year OS rates were 55% (95% CI, 46%-63%) and 42% (95% CI, 34%-50%), respectively. In patients without bone metastases, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 46.6-NC) and 44.5 months (95% CI, 38.3-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 147) and osimertinib alone (n = 136), respectively (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.57-1.10).
Finally, in patients harboring TP53 alterations, those given osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 46) experienced a median OS of 51.1 months (95% CI, 35.0-NC) vs 43.1 months (95% CI, 34.0-50.1) for those administered osimertinib alone (n = 40; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27). The 3-year OS rates were 65% (95% CI, 49%-77%) and 58% (95% CI, 41%-71%), respectively. In patients with TP53 wild-type disease, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 46.6-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 33) and NR (95% CI, 41.3-NC) for osimertinib alone (n = 34; HR, 0.70; 0.32-1.54).
Notably, prior data from this study supported the February 2024 FDA approval of osimertinib plus platinum-based chemotherapy for use in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test.3
FLAURA2 enrolled patients at least 18 years of age with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations.1 Patients were also required to have a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with stable CNS metastases were allowed to enroll, and brain scans were mandatory at baseline.
Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive osimertinib at 80 mg per day in combination with pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin at area under the curve 5 or cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by osimertinib at 80 mg once per day plus pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks as maintenance therapy; or osimertinib alone at 80 mg per day. Treatment beyond disease progression was permitted at investigator discretion.
Investigator-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 criteria served as the trial’s primary end point. OS was a key secondary end point.
Disclosures: Jänne reported serving on an advisory board or committee for AstraZeneca, Mirati Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Plizer, Roche/Genentech, Chugai, El Lilly, Ignyta, Takeda, Novartis, Voronoi, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Biocartis, LOXO Oncology, PUMA, Sanofi, Transcenta, Daichi Sankyo, Bayer, Silicon Therapeutics, AbbVie, Monte Rosa, Merus, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, Scorpion Therapeutics, Merus, Frontier Medicines, Hongyun Biotechnology, Duality Biologics, Blueprint Medicines, Dizal Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Tolremo, Myris Therapeutics, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and receiving grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Takeda, PUMA, Astellas Pharmaceuticals, and Daiichi Sankyo. He also is the co-inventor of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)–owned patent on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp, and he reported royalties on DFCI-owned intellectual property on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp.
Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers
A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.