Overcoming the “Nihilism” Surrounding the Small Cell Lung Cancer Prognosis

Commentary
Video

Clinical trials in small cell lung cancer appear to be more “pragmatic” with their inclusion criteria than before, according to Anne Chiang, MD, PhD.

Education and communication are key in clearing up the “nihilism” that surrounds the prognosis of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), according to Anne Chiang, MD, PhD.

Chiang, an associate professor of Medicine in the Section of Medical Oncology at Yale School of Medicine, spoke with CancerNetwork® about considerations for optimizing the quality of care of patients with SCLC and other types of lung cancer in a community-based setting. She highlighted how the survival of this patient population has generally improved with the addition of immunotherapy to frontline treatment. To push the envelope and further improve outcomes among patients, Chiang described the necessity of leveraging the field’s understanding of disease biology to impart the benefits of therapy to more patients.

Additionally, Chiang noted how clinical trials in SCLC have become more “pragmatic” with their eligibility criteria than before. For example, more trials appear to allow the enrollment of patients with prior chemotherapy or asymptomatic brain metastases.

Transcript:

Education and communicating the advances that are happening are important. There’s still a bit of nihilism about the prognosis of our patients, and for [SCLC], this is a disease that, 5 years ago, most patients had an overall survival of a year. Now, we’re seeing with the addition of immunotherapy to the frontline regimen, that about 18% make it to 3 years, and for your 5- and 6-year overall survival, you have about 10% of the patients making it there. Obviously, we need to still push that envelope; we need to understand, explore, and leverage our understanding of the biology. How can we impart that benefit to more patients? To do that, we need to get them treated, and we need to get them treated early on. There are trials now that are much more pragmatic than before. I’m seeing those trials that allow patients with brain metastases who are asymptomatic to go on. I’m seeing trials that allow patients to have a first cycle of chemotherapy before they go on to the clinical trial. Both of those are classic elements of clinical trials that patients [typically] couldn’t go on because of that.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Related Content