(P115) The Experience of a Radiation Oncology Center in Gauging the Use of Single-Fraction Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 29
Issue 4_Suppl_1

We observed an increase in the use of SFRT for bone metastases over the time period covered. Tracking the encounters by ICD codes and CPT codes, when properly coded, served as a useful tool in providing a snapshot view of SFRT usage. Additionally, physician education is a prerequisite for the proper use of a CPT 77431 to capture the true rate of usage of SFRT in clinical practice.

George A. Dawson, MD, Ignat Glushko, MBA, Alice V. Cheuk, MD; Veterans Health Administration

BACKGROUND: There is mounting category 1 evidence of the effectiveness of single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) in the treatment of uncomplicated, painful bone metastases [Jones, CA Cancer J Clin 2014]. Surveys indicate that physicians in the United States still prefer multiple fractions of RT for uncomplicated bone metastases compared with their Canadian or European colleagues [Popovic et al, Radiother Oncol 2014].

In this report, we used current procedure terminology (CPT) code tracking to determine the scope of use of SFRT for painful malignant bone lesions compared with multiple-fraction RT (MFRT).

METHOD: We searched for encounters with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code 198.5-Secondary malignancy of bone and/or bone marrow either in primary or secondary positions-and current procedural terminology (CPT) code 77431-Physician weekly visit for 1–2 treatments. Data points below represent 77431 usage only.

From 2002 to 2008, usage was as follows: 2002 (0), 2003 (0), 2004 (5), 2005 (1), 2006 (7), 2007 (4), and 2008 (0). From 2009 to October 13, 2014, usage was as follows: 2009 (0), 2010 (0), 2011 (4), 2012 (12), 2013 (10), and 2014 (8). These periods were chosen to reflect a surge in interest in SFRT usage at the end of life, such as the Choosing Wisely Campaign of the American Society of Radiation Oncology in 2013.

Data limitations/assumptions: Not all providers code appropriately for both procedures and diagnosis.

RESULTS: We noted a 133% increase in the use of SFRT for painful bone lesions at our center from 2002–2008 to 2009–October 13, 2014. On average, CPT code 77431 was used 2.43 times a year for patients with ICD code 198.5 of bone metastases from 2002–2008, and 5.67 times (8.50 times, excluding 2009 and 2010) from 2009–October 13, 2014. Of note, in 2002, 2003, 2008, 2009, and 2010, CPT code 77431 was not used at all.

CONCLUSION: We observed an increase in the use of SFRT for bone metastases over the time period covered. Tracking the encounters by ICD codes and CPT codes, when properly coded, served as a useful tool in providing a snapshot view of SFRT usage. Additionally, physician education is a prerequisite for the proper use of a CPT 77431 to capture the true rate of usage of SFRT in clinical practice.

Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(P005) Ultrasensitive PSA Identifies Patients With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Requiring Postop Radiotherapy
(P001) Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the United States According to Health Insurance Status
(P002) Predictors of CNS Disease in Metastatic Melanoma: Desmoplastic Subtype Associated With Higher Risk
(P003) Identification of Somatic Mutations Using Fine Needle Aspiration: Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
(P004) A Retrospective Study to Assess Disparities in the Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Proton Therapy (PT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer (PCa)
(S001) Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Re-Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-A Fifteen-Year Experience
(S003) Weekly IGRT Volumetric Response Analysis as a Predictive Tool for Locoregional Control in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 
(S004) Combination of Radiotherapy and Cetuximab for Aggressive, High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Propensity Score Analysis
(S005) Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx Over Five Decades: Experience at a Single Institution
(S002) Prognostic Value of Intraradiation Treatment FDG-PET Parameters in Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
(P006) The Role of Sequential Imaging in Cervical Cancer Management
(P008) Pretreatment FDG Uptake of Nontarget Lung Tissue Correlates With Symptomatic Pneumonitis Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
(P009) Monte Carlo Dosimetry Evaluation of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery
(P010) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastasis: Toxicity, Outcomes, and Patterns of Failure
(P011) Stereotactic Radiosurgery and BRAF Inhibitor Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Associated With Increased Risk for Radiation Necrosis
Recent Videos
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
Related Content