Paclitaxel-Encequidar Combo Effective Treatment for Patients with Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma

Article

The combination of oral paclitaxel and encequidar has the potential to be an effective treatment for patients with radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma.

According to data presented at the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, the combination of oral paclitaxel and encequidar (oPac+E) has the potential to be an effective treatment for patients with radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma.1

The researchers assessed activity, safety and tolerability of oPac 205 mg/m2 plus E 12.9 mg once daily for 3 consecutive days weekly in patients with unresectable cutaneous angiosarcoma. The primary outcome of the study was tumor response to therapy every 6 weeks.

From August 2018 to May 2020, 7 patients (median age, 66 years; range, 49-76) were diagnosed with breast cutaneous angiosarcoma. All patients had previously been diagnosed with breast cancer and received a mastectomy and radiotherapy and/or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Three patients (43%) achieved a complete response on the combination, and also achieved stable disease (43%). One patient achieved a partial response to therapy. Forty-three percent of patients crossed over to receive curative surgical resection.

The combination was generally well tolerated, with grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in 5 patients. The most common grade 3 TRAEs included fatigue (2 cases), diarrhea, dyspnea, dehydration, pneumonitis and neutropenia (one case each). Three patients needed dose reductions, however there were no treatment discontinuations as a result of AEs. No patient deaths have been reported to date.

The authors concluded that the combination may be an effective oral treatment for patients with radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma, with limited toxicities, which could offer patients the potential to avoid intravenous chemotherapy at a hospital.

Reference:

Ravi V, Wagner M, Chen TWW, et al. A phase 2 study of oral paclitaxel and encequidar (oPac+E) in the treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma: The breast angiosarcoma subgroup. Presented at: 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 8-11; 2020; Virtual. Poster PS13-05.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content