Palliative Treatment Options Scare for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas

Article

Patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas who are unable to obtain complete resection after initial resection are left with few treatment options for palliative therapy, according to the results of a recent study.

Patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas who are unable to obtain complete resection after initial resection are left with few treatment options for palliative therapy, according to the results of a study published recently in Annals of Oncology.

Within retroperitoneal sarcomas, advanced disease includes unresectable locoregional disease, abdominal sarcomatosis, and distant metastasis. Although a second surgical resection is an option for patients, the likelihood of a complete resection decreases with relapses, according to the researchers led by Maud Toulmonde, MD, of the Institut Bergonié, France.

“The two major drugs used in advanced soft-tissue sarcomas are doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Trabectedin has also shown activity, especially in liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas,” Toulmonde and colleagues wrote. “However, apart from these drugs, options are limited and inclusion in a clinical trial is the best choice. Until recently, very few phase II clinical trials for new drugs in advanced soft-tissue sarcomas have focused on specific histological subtypes and retrospective studies on this topic are rare and small.”

To further understand the patterns of palliative therapy within retroperitoneal sarcomas, the researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 10 years of data on adult patients with the disease. The study included 586 patients, of whom 51% received palliative chemotherapy (176 with metastatic disease and 123 with locoregional evolution) and 8.5% underwent palliative surgery.

Of the 299 patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy, half had treatment with a single chemotherapy, most often an anthracycline (75%). Thirty patients underwent additional maintenance chemotherapy after their first-line treatment.

“Response rate with anthracyclines was only 15% for liposarcomas, and only one response was observed for dedifferentiated liposarcoma without anthracyclines,” the researchers wrote. “These results are concordant with two smaller studies, which evaluated chemotherapy for advanced well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and support the poor sensitivity of liposarcoma to conventional chemotherapy.”

The researchers assessed response in 255 (85%) patients and found that 27% had progressive disease, 57% had stable disease, 14.5% had partial disease, and 1.5% had a complete response. Patients had a median of 5.9 months from initiation of palliative treatment until disease progression and a median overall survival of 15.8 months.

“We did not find any benefit in survival for palliative surgery,” the researchers wrote. “However, we cannot exclude that this treatment may have a symptomatic role and therefore an impact on quality of life, notwithstanding its potential morbidity.”

Currently, based on the modest benefit of palliative surgery and chemotherapy, best supportive care should be considered in patients with a poor performance status, the researchers said.

Recent Videos
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Related Content