Partial-Breast Radiation Appears Effective, Safe in Early Breast Cancer

Fact checked by" Roman Fabbricatore
News
Article

Phase 3 data affirm the use of partial-breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy as a standard of care in patients with low-risk early-stage breast cancer.

"Demonstration of the long-term efficacy of radiotherapy despite a reduction in the irradiated volume of breast tissue (without any change to dose fractionation) supports the ongoing use of partial-breast radiotherapy delivered by intensity-modulated radiation techniques in this population as a standard of care internationally," according to the study authors.

"Demonstration of the long-term efficacy of radiotherapy despite a reduction in the irradiated volume of breast tissue (without any change to dose fractionation) supports the ongoing use of partial-breast radiotherapy delivered by intensity-modulated radiation techniques in this population as a standard of care internationally," according to the study authors.

The use of partial-breast and reduced-dose radiotherapy appeared to be as safe and effective as whole-breast radiotherapy among patients with low-risk early breast cancer, according to 10-year findings from the phase 3 UK IMPORT LOW trial (NCT00814567) published in Lancet Oncology.1

Across the intention-to-treat population, the 10-year incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.8%-4.5%) in the whole-breast radiation group, 1.9% (95% CI, 1.1%-3.5%) in the reduced-dose radiation group, and 3.0% (95% CI, 1.9%-4.8%) in the partial-breast radiation group. Compared with whole-breast radiation, data showed an estimated absolute difference in 10-year IBTR incidence of –1.02% (95% CI, –1.98% to 0.99%) for reduced-dose radiation and 0.16% (95% CI, –1.28% to 2.89%) for partial-breast radiation.

At 10 years, locoregional recurrence occurred in 3.2% (95% CI, 2.0%-5.0%) of the whole-breast radiation group, 1.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.5%) of the reduced-dose radiation group, and 3.5% (95% CI, 2.3%-5.4%) of the partial-breast radiation group. In each respective group, the 10-year distant recurrence rate was 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5%-5.7%), 4.1% (95% CI, 2.8%-6.1%), and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5%-5.7%). Additionally, the respective 10-year all-cause mortality rates were 12.3% (95% CI, 10.0%-15.1%), 13.1% (95% CI, 10.7%-15.9%), and 9.8% (95% CI, 7.7%-12.4%).

“This prespecified 10-year analysis of IBTR and clinician-reported adverse effects [AEs] in patients with a lower-than-average risk of IBTR reaffirms that partial-breast and reduced-dose radiotherapy are as effective and safe as whole-breast radiotherapy in this population. [Ten]-year incidence of IBTR was no higher than 3%, and clinician-reported moderate-marked breast shrinkage occurred in less than 10% of [patients] in all groups,” lead study author Anna M. Kirby, MBBChir, MD(Res), FRCR, from the Breast Unit at Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, wrote with coauthors in the publication.1 “Demonstration of the long-term efficacy of radiotherapy despite a reduction in the irradiated volume of breast tissue (without any change to dose fractionation) supports the ongoing use of partial-breast radiotherapy delivered by intensity-modulated radiation techniques in this population as a standard of care internationally.”

In the open-label, multicenter, noninferiority phase 3 IMPORT LOW trial, 2018 patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive whole-breast radiation at 40 Gy in 15 fractions (n = 675), reduced-dose radiation at 36 Gy in 15 fractions to the whole breast plus 40 Gy in 15 fractions to the partial breast (n = 674), or partial-breast radiation at 40 Gy in 15 fractions (n = 669).

The trial’s primary end point was the cumulative incidence of IBTR at 5 years, which investigators defined as the presence of any invasive or noninvasive carcinoma anywhere in the ipsilateral breast parenchyma or overlying skin. Secondary end points included location of local tumor recurrence, invasive IBTR, locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence-free survival, recurrence-free interval, overall survival, and other second primary cancers.

Patients 50 years or older with invasive adenocarcinoma and a tumor size pathologically determined to be 3 cm or smaller in diameter, unifocal disease, grade 1 to 3 disease, and negative axillary lymph nodes or 1 to 3 positive nodes were eligible for enrollment in the trial.2 Other eligibility criteria included having no prior malignancy apart from nonmelanoma skin cancer, no prior endocrine therapy or chemotherapy, and no concurrent chemoradiation. Patients were allowed to receive neoadjuvant endocrine therapy if the tumor was smaller than 3 cm and they fulfilled all other inclusion criteria.

The median patient age was 63 years (IQR, 58-68), with most patients having grade 2 tumors (48%). Additionally, the median follow-up was 120 months (IQR, 119-122) in the whole-breast radiation group, 121 months (IQR, 120-122) in the reduced-dose radiation group, and 120 months (IQR, 119-122) in the partial-breast radiation group.

Second primary cancers apart from breast tumors were reported in 9% of the whole-breast radiation group, 8% of the reduced-dose radiation group, and 6% of the partial-breast radiation group; the most common types of malignancies included lung, colorectal, and gynecological cancers.

Ten-year late AEs included breast shrinkage in 9% of the whole-breast radiation group, 9% of the reduced-dose radiation group, and 7% of the partial-breast radiation group. Additionally, 4, 7, and 3 patients from each group experienced rib fractures; 4, 6, and 4 had symptomatic lung fibrosis; 7, 5, and 5 had ischemic heart disease; and 16, 13, and 11 experienced persistent coughing.

References

  1. Kirby AM, Finneran L, Griffin CL, et al. Partial-breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for women with early breast cancer (UK IMPORT LOW): ten-year outcomes from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2025;26(7):898-910. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00194-9
  2. Radiation therapy in women with low risk early-stage breast cancer who have undergone breast conservation surgery (IMPORT). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated February 27, 2019. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/46xdcwkn
Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
Although 1 of 21 patients with liver-dominant NETs died due to RILD in the phase 1 study, no RILD-induced deaths were observed in the phase 2 trial.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
A simulation procedure helped to ascertain chemotherapy tolerability before administering radioembolization therapy for NETs with liver metastases.
Related Content