Patient Advocate Speaks to Value of Communicating Developments in Breast Cancer

Commentary
Video

Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.

The development of new drug classes for managing breast cancer following first- or second-line CDK4/6 inhibitors is ongoing but a lack of definitive options in this treatment setting is a “double-edged sword,” said Abigail M. Johnston, JD, in a conversation with CancerNetwork® at the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

Johnston, a patient advocate for those with metastatic breast cancer at SurvivingBreastCancer.org and a trial attorney based in Orlando, Florida, spoke about an education session at SABCS that focused on treating patients following prior therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Outside of administering alpelisib [Piqray] to those with PIK3CA mutations, there aren’t many other “definitive options,” Johnston said. Due to this, doctors will likely develop flowcharts as they explore new treatment options for patients in later lines of therapy to help with stratification. She also stated that practices should communicate with their patients that the process of determining suitable therapies in these treatment settings is a “developing area.”

Transcript:

I believe what we're going to see, and this is what the doctors on the panel talked about, is in the next couple of years, we're going to have a lot more flowcharts. It's kind of like a ‘Choose Your Own Adventure.’ We're going to have more of those charts being developed in the next few years. Right now, if it appears that the doctors are looking for what would be the next thing, that's exactly what they're doing. My exhortation to them was to ‘tell your patients that; tell your patients that this is a developing area.’

We're going through these ideas, and we're going to make the best decision we can, but there's not a lot that is set in stone. There's not a lot that's definitive other than alpelisib [Piqray] for PIK3CA mutations. That can be a little scary [for patients] if you think about that and if there's not a set sequence, but at the same time, there are also lots of options now. It's a little bit of a double-edged sword. But that's where we are right now with all these new developing classes of drugs, and it is pretty exciting to see some of the innovation that's happening.

Recent Videos
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Related Content