Patient Advocate Speaks to Value of Communicating Developments in Breast Cancer

Commentary
Video

Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.

The development of new drug classes for managing breast cancer following first- or second-line CDK4/6 inhibitors is ongoing but a lack of definitive options in this treatment setting is a “double-edged sword,” said Abigail M. Johnston, JD, in a conversation with CancerNetwork® at the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

Johnston, a patient advocate for those with metastatic breast cancer at SurvivingBreastCancer.org and a trial attorney based in Orlando, Florida, spoke about an education session at SABCS that focused on treating patients following prior therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Outside of administering alpelisib [Piqray] to those with PIK3CA mutations, there aren’t many other “definitive options,” Johnston said. Due to this, doctors will likely develop flowcharts as they explore new treatment options for patients in later lines of therapy to help with stratification. She also stated that practices should communicate with their patients that the process of determining suitable therapies in these treatment settings is a “developing area.”

Transcript:

I believe what we're going to see, and this is what the doctors on the panel talked about, is in the next couple of years, we're going to have a lot more flowcharts. It's kind of like a ‘Choose Your Own Adventure.’ We're going to have more of those charts being developed in the next few years. Right now, if it appears that the doctors are looking for what would be the next thing, that's exactly what they're doing. My exhortation to them was to ‘tell your patients that; tell your patients that this is a developing area.’

We're going through these ideas, and we're going to make the best decision we can, but there's not a lot that is set in stone. There's not a lot that's definitive other than alpelisib [Piqray] for PIK3CA mutations. That can be a little scary [for patients] if you think about that and if there's not a set sequence, but at the same time, there are also lots of options now. It's a little bit of a double-edged sword. But that's where we are right now with all these new developing classes of drugs, and it is pretty exciting to see some of the innovation that's happening.

Recent Videos
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Related Content