Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Respond to Camrelizumab/Apatinib Combo in Second-Line Setting

Article

Data presented at the 2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium shows promise for the combination of camrelizumab plus apatinib for previously treated patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Results of a single-arm, open-label phase 2 study revealed positive clinical results coupled with an acceptable safety profile for camrelizumab (SHR-1210) plus apatinib (Rivoceranib) as therapy in the second-line setting for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

This study (NCT03736863), whose data were presented during the 2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, was the first to explore the combination of a PD-1 inhibitor with an anti-angiogenesis inhibitor as second-line treatment for patients with advanced ESCC.

The anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody camrelizumab induced significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared with chemotherapy in the randomized phase 3 ESCORT study of Chinese patients with advanced ESCC, but the absolute long-term survival benefit from PD-1 inhibitors remains limited. New treatment options that are effective in this patient population are needed, which led to the rationale for this study. The trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with the VEGFR2 inhibitor apatinib in the second-line setting.

The trial, which remains ongoing, is enrolling patients with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC across China. To be included in the study, patients must have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, be aged 18 to 75 years, and have progressed on or were intolerant to frontline chemotherapy. Camrelizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks, and apatinib was given at 250 mg orally daily in 4-week cycles. The primary end point is investigator-assessed ORR, and secondary end points include OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR).

With a data cutoff date of November 16, 2020, a total of 46 patients had been enrolled from 9 sites and all were included in the full analysis set, as well as the safety analysis set. Thirty patients were evaluated in the per-protocol analysis set. The majority of patients were male (n = 38) and had an ECOG performance status of 1 (n = 34). The median age was 63 (range, 48-72) and metastatic sites included lymph nodes in 35 patients, lung in 9, and liver in 8. Forty-six patients had undergone prior chemotherapy, 33 had undergone surgery, and 17 received radiotherapy.

The ORR among 30 evaluable patients was 43.3%, with 4 patients achieving a complete response (CR) with camrelizumab, 9 achieving a partial response (PR), and 15 reaching stable disease (SD). After confirmation, 3 patients had a CR and 7 had a PR for an ORR of 33.3%. Patients who had a response to treatment demonstrated better tumor shrinkage than those who did not respond. The DCR was 93.3%.

The median PFS was 4.07 months with the combination (95% CI, 3.75-not available). The median 3-month OS rate was 82.2%, the 6-month rate was 67.6%, and the 9-month OS rate was 61.5%.

Overall, 33 patients (71.7%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and these events were grade 3 or higher in 23 patients. The most common grade 3 or higher TEAEs included elevated aspartate aminotransferase in 7 patients (15.2%), elevated alanine transaminase in 5 (10.9%), elevated glutamyltransferase in 4 (8.7%), hemorrhage in 3 (6.5%), and increased total bilirubin, increased direct bilirubin, and esophageal fistula in 2 patients each (4.4%).

Eleven patients temporarily discontinued treatment or had a reduced dose of camrelizumab due to TEAEs.

In terms of any-grade immune-related AEs, 4 patients (8.7%) had thyroid function abnormalities, 2 (4.3%) had reactive capillary endothelial proliferation (RCEP), and 1 (2.2%) had pneumonitis. The only grade 3 or higher immune-related event was RCEP, which occurred in 1 patient (2.2%).

Patients received treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal from the study, or investigator decision. Tumor response was evaluated every 2 cycles for the first 12 cycles of treatment, and then every 3 cycles thereafter by RECIST 1.1. AEs were assessed continuously for up to 90 days following the last dose of treatment.

Further randomized phase 3 clinical trials are warranted to further understand the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in this patient population.

Reference:

Wang F, Wang J, Wu T, et al. Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-arm, open-label, phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 3):215.

Recent Videos
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Combining renal vaccines with immune therapy may better target tumor cells while limiting harm to healthy tissue, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
Improving data collection and biomarker development across institutions may represent areas of expansion in kidney cancer research.
Related Content