Pembrolizumab/Chemo Improves Responses in dMMR/pMMR Endometrial Cancer

Commentary
Video

Pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in response rates in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer.

The phase 3 NRG-GY018 trial (NCT03914612) produced an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and complete responses (CR), in patients with stage III or IVA, stage IVB, or recurrent endometrial cancer after receiving the treatment of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) with carboplatin and paclitaxel, according to Ramez N. Eskander, MD.1

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Eskander, a gynecologic oncologist and assistant professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences at the University of California, San Diego Health, discussed the results of treatment in the cohorts of patients with both mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) disease and mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) disease.

In the dMMR population, patients treated with the pembrolizumab combination achieved an ORR of 82% (95% CI, 72%-89%) compared with 71% (95% CI, 60%-80%) in the placebo arm (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 0.92-3.66). Investigators reported a partial response (PR) rate of 50% vs 55% and a CR rate of 32% vs 15% in the pembrolizumab and placebo arms, respectively.

The ORR in the pMMR population was 71% (95% CI, 64%-77%) in the pembrolizumab cohort vs 58% (95% CI, 52%-65%) in the placebo cohort (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.18-2.58). Each respective arm achieved a PR rate of 56% vs 50% and a CR rate of 15% vs 8%.

Transcript:

When we presented the ORR rate data for the first time, it was after we had reported the primary efficacy analysis for PFS in both populations. It is important to recognize that the PFS end point was reached at the first interim analysis when we completed accrual to both the dMMR and pMMR endometrial cancer patient cohorts. We had at least 50% of [PFS] events. Those results were presented and then simultaneously published [in the New England Journal of Medicine] showing strong benefit to the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy that was both clinically and statistically significant in the dMMR and pMMR patient populations.2 Subsequently, we looked at those patients who were enrolled in a trial with measurable disease so that we could look at the ORR. What we saw was there was also an improvement in the ORR for both the dMMR and the pMMR patient populations. What was provocative for us was that we saw a doubling of the CRs from 15% to 32%, in the dMMR population, and from 8% to 15%, in the pMMR population. Not only did we see an improvement in the ORR, but we saw a doubling of the CRs. One of the things that I thought was most important was when you looked at the waterfall plots for the responses in these patients, you saw that it was not driven by a small subset of patients in either of these cohorts. You saw that the benefit was distributed almost uniformly across the subjects who achieved a response to the study-directed therapy, meaning the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy. This highlighted the fact that this benefit was distributed throughout patients, and that was reflected in the improvement in the ORR and then the doubling of the CRs.

References

  1. Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, et al. SEMINAL: Pembrolizumab versus placebo in addition to carboplatin and paclitaxel for measurable stage III or IVA, stage IVB, or recurrent endometrial cancer: the phase 3, NRG GY018 study. 2023 Annual Global Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS). November 5-7, 2023; Seoul, South Korea.
  2. Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(23):2159-2170. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2302312
Recent Videos
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Surgery and radiation chemotherapy can affect immunotherapy’s ability to target tumor cells in the nervous system, according to John Henson, MD.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Related Content