Performance Status, Disease Stage Impact Regorafenib Outcomes in mCRC

News
Article

Real-world data may elucidate the characteristics and factors that influence long-term remission with regorafenib among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

“These results increase our understanding of patient profiles and factors that influence the effectiveness of regorafenib in real-world clinical practice,” according to the study authors.

“These results increase our understanding of patient profiles and factors that influence the effectiveness of regorafenib in real-world clinical practice,” according to the study authors.

Characteristics including performance status and disease stage correlated with how patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) achieved long-term remission following treatment with regorafenib (Stivarga), according to findings presented during the 2024 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

Specifically, patients with long-term responses had favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at regorafenib initiation; less advanced disease at the time of diagnosis; and many were also recipients of prior bevacizumab (Avastin).

“This real-world study, performed in the USA and outside of a controlled clinical trial setting, aimed to determine the proportion of patients who had a long-term response to regorafenib,” the authors said in their poster presentation.

The study analyzed data from 2326 patients who started regorafenib monotherapy between July 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. A total of 346 patients (15%; median age, 65 years) had a long-term remission of 5 or more months, with 503 patients (22%; median age 65 years) having a long-term remission of 4 months or longer.

Among the cohort of patients with a remission lasting 5 months or longer, less than half (46%; n=160) had stage IV disease at the time of diagnosis. The majority (68%; n=237) had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and/or received prior bevacizumab (64%; n=221). Of patients who were tested at index, the median carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was 35 ng/mL (range, 9-139). Slightly more than half (51%) had a KRAS mutation, and 5% had a BRAF mutation at index.

The median time from CRC diagnosis to index date was 39.2 months (range, 25.1-64.1), and 33% and 23% received regorafenib as a third-line or fourth-line treatment, respectively. Median time to regorafenib discontinuation was 7.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-7.8).

Findings showed that patient characteristics were similar among patients who had remissions lasting 4 months or longer, with 48% (n=241) having stage IV at diagnosis, 66% (n=332) having an ECOG performance status of 0-1; 68% (n=341) having prior bevacizumab; median CEA level of 40 (range, 9-152); 54% and 6% harboring KRAS and BRAF mutations, respectively.

Median time from diagnosis to index was 38.6 months (range, 24.8-62.8), with 34% and 23%, respectively, receiving regorafenib as a third-line or fourth-line therapy. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.-6.2).

Among patients who started regorafenib therapy before the year 2019, (n=1,070), 14% had a remission lasting 5 or more months, while 21% had a remission lasting 4 months or longer. In patients who started the therapy 2019 or later, (n=1,256), 16% and 22% had remissions lasting 5 months and 4 months or longer, respectively.

“These results increase our understanding of patient profiles and factors that influence the effectiveness of regorafenib in real-world clinical practice,” the poster read.

Reference

Kim RD, Pan X, Ostojic H, et. al. Real-world (RW) study in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with long-term responses to regorafenib in the USA. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 48). doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.48

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Related Content