Perioperative Oxaliplatin With S-1 Demonstrates Significant Clinical Activity in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Article

Research suggests that perioperative S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with gastric cancer who have had a D2 gastrectomy yields a clinically significant improvement over adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin.

For patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who have undergone D2 gastrectomy, perioperative S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated meaningful clinically benefit when compared with adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx), according to data from the randomized phase 3 RESOLVE trial (NCT01534546) published in Lancet Oncology.

Investigators reported an estimated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 51.1% in the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT; 95% CI, 45.5%-56.3%) for patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 56.5% (95% CI, 51.0%-61.7%) for patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 59.4% (95% CI, 53.8%-64.6%) for patients in the perioperative-SOX group. Additionally, investigators reported a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 when comparing perioperative SOX with adjuvant CapOX (95% CI,0.61-0.97; Wald P = .028) and 0.86 when comparing adjuvant SOX with adjuvant CapOX (95% CI, 0.68-1.07; Wald P = .17).

“In our superiority analysis, patients in the perioperative-SOX group had significantly longer 3-year [DFS] and a similarly lower number of complications compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group,” the investigators wrote. “In the non-inferiority analysis, [DFS] and adverse [effects (AEs)] were similar between the adjuvant-SOX group and the adjuvant-CapOx group, and the HR was within the prespecified margin.”

The study randomized 1094 patients to 3 treatment groups between August 15, 2012, to February 28, 2017, 1022 of whom were included in the mITT population (adjuvant-CapOx, n = 345; adjuvant-SOX, n = 340; and perioperative-SOX, n = 337). In total, 8%, 8%, and 23% of patients in the adjuvant-CapOx, adjuvant-SOX, and perioperative-SOX groups were excluded due to protocol violations, respectively. The median follow-up was 40.6 months (IQR, 18.2-53.1).

In the adjuvant-CapOx group, patients received adjuvant chemotherapy 4 to 8 weeks post-surgery for 8 21-day treatment cycles. Patients received a 2-hour intravenous infusion of 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 plus 1000 mg/m2 oral capecitabine twice a day for 2 weeks, followed by one week of rest during each cycle. In the adjuvant-SOX group, patients received the same adjuvant chemotherapy and oxaliplatin backbone, plus oral S-1 twice daily at a dose of 40 to 60 mg. In the perioperative-SOX group, patients received S-1 at a dose of 40 to 60 mg twice daily for 3 cycles preoperatively and 5 cycles postoperatively; this was followed by 3 cycles of single agent S-1.

Eligibility criteria required patients have histologically confirmed cT4a N+ M0 or cT4b Nany M0 gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with measurable or evaluable lesions according to RECIST 1.0 criteria.

Findings from the post-hoc analysis highlighted an objective response rate (ORR) of 41.0% (95% CI, 32.1%-49.9%) among those treated with perioperative SOX. Moreover, evaluable patients within this group (n = 117) had a complete response rate of 1.7%, a partial response rate of 39%, and a stable disease stable disease rate of 54%.

Any grade AEs were reported in 62% of patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 50% of patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 68% of patients in the perioperative-SOX group. Grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 17%, 19%, and 21% of patients from each of the cohorts, respectively. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or higher AE, which was observed in 12%, 8%, and 10% of patients, respectively.

Serious AEs were reported in 3% of patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 3% of patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 2% of patients in the perioperative-SOX group. Common serious AEs included hypoalbuminemia and neutropenia in the adjuvant-CapOx group; nausea, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia in the perioperative-SOX group; and neutropenia and intestinal obstruction in the adjuvant-SOX group.

“Perioperative SOX should be considered a standard procedure for the management of [patients with] locally advanced gastric. In our non-inferiority analysis, adjuvant SOX was non-inferior to adjuvant CapOx,” the investigators concluded.

Reference

Zhang X, Liang H, Li Z, et al. Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(8):1081-1092. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00297-7

Recent Videos
Additional genetic testing measures and targeted therapies may improve outcomes for patients with diverse molecular subgroups of gastric cancers.
Data from the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials reveal that zolbetuximab increased survival in patients with CLDN18.2-positive gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.
The incorporation of zolbetuximab in addition to chemotherapy has shown benefit in patients with Claudin 18.2–positive gastric cancers in clinical trials.
Related Content