Peter Voorhees, MD, Discusses Updated Analysis of Phase 2 GRIFFIN Trial in MM

Video

The expert from the Levine Cancer Institute discussed the findings from an updated analysis of the phase 2 GRIFFIN Trial for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Peter Voorhees, MD, of the Levine Cancer Institute, spoke about findings from an updated analysis of the Phase 2 GRIFFIN Trial for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Transcription:

What we show with this updated analysis is that the rates of stringent [complete response (CR] continue to improve and clearly favor the daratumumab (Darzalex) arm. So, looking at stringent CR in the daratumumab arm, we're now up to 63.6% with one year of maintenance therapy, in contrast to 47.4% for those in the control arm and this is highly statistically significant. If we look at all complete responses stringent to non-stringent, it's close to 82% in the daratumumab compared to close to 61% in the control arm. When we look at MRD negativity, measured with [next generation sequencing] at a sensitivity level of 10-5 in the intent to treat analysis, the [minimal residual disease (MRD)] negative rate in the daratumumab arm is 62 and a half percent in contrast to 27% for those in the control arm. If we look at those patients specifically who have MRD evaluable disease, the rates of MRD negativity in the experimental arm of the daratumumab arm is 78%, in contrast to 39.5% in the control arm.

Recent Videos
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Related Content