PFS Boost With Atezolizumab in Advanced Squamous NSCLC

News
Article

The addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy was associated with superior PFS but did not improve preliminary OS.

Adding atezolizumab immunotherapy to chemotherapy is associated with a reduced risk of tumor progression and death among patients with advanced squamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to initial findings from the randomized phase III IMpower 131 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02367794; abstract LBA9000). The findings were presented at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 1–5 in Chicago.

The combination was associated with twice the investigator-assessed 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate compared with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel–based chemotherapy alone (24.7% vs 12.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60–0.85; P = .0001), reported lead study author Robert M. Jotte, MD, PhD, of Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, Colorado.

“We used to think that chemotherapy just knocked down the patient’s immune system and that it would be irrational to combine it with immunotherapy, but growing research, including this study, shows that chemotherapy can help trigger the immune response to the tumor, helping the immunotherapy treatment to work better,” Jotte said.

Atezolizumab targets programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), but patient benefits did not depend on tumor PD-L1 expression, Jotte reported.

Patients received 4 or 6 cycles of chemotherapy with (n = 343) or without atezolizumab (n = 340) until progression.

Nearly all patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (94.6% of those receiving atezolizumab with chemotherapy and 90.7% of those receiving only carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel). Serious toxicities were reported for 20% and 10.5% of patients in the atezolizumab and control groups, respectively.

“The safety profile was consistent with the known risks of the individual treatment components,” Jotte reported. “No new safety signals were identified.”

Confirmed objective response rates were higher and duration of response was longer with atezolizumab plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 expression.

Interim overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population was nearly identical between the study arms (14 months vs. 13.9 months in the control group).

“Overall survival continues to be followed, with the next interim OS analysis anticipated late in 2018,” Jotte said.

Jotte disclosed financial relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Recent Videos
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Destigmatizing cancer care for incarcerated patients may help ensure that they feel supported both in their treatment and their humanity.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
A lower percentage of patients who were released within 1 year of incarceration received guideline-concurrent care vs incarcerated patients.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
A collaboration between the Connecticut Departments of Health and Corrections and the COPPER Center aimed to improve outcomes among incarcerated patients.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Computational models help researchers anticipate how ADCs may behave in later lines of development, while they are still in the early stages.
ADC payloads with high levels of potency can sometimes lead to higher levels of toxicity, which can eliminate the therapeutic window for patients with cancer.
Related Content