PFS With Ibrutinib Combo is ‘Promising’ in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

News
Video

Ibrutinib plus venetoclax appears to be effective across the overall chronic lymphocytic leukemia population in the CAPTIVATE study, although progression-free survival is shorter for those with TP53 mutations.

During the 2023 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting, Paolo Ghia, MD, PhD, spoke with CancerNetwork® about how combining ibrutinib (Imbruvica) with venetoclax (Venclexta) yielded positive progression-free survival (PFS) data in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma based on up to 5 years of follow-up data from the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.

According to Ghia, a full professor in Medical Oncology at Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, and the deputy chairman of the Division of Experimental Oncology at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, fixed-duration therapy with ibrutinib plus venetoclax appeared to be effective across the general study population. However, the PFS rate was lower for those with TP53-mutated disease; he suggested that further follow up may be necessary for this patient subgroup.

The 54-month PFS rate was 70% (95% CI, 62%-77%) in the fixed-duration cohort (n = 159) and 45% (95% CI, 25%-64%) in those with a TP53 mutation or 17p deletion (n = 27). Additionally, investigators reported corresponding rates of 68% (95% CI, 50%-80%) in patients with unmutated IGHV (n = 40), 64% (95% CI, 30%-85%) in those with an 11q deletion (n = 11), and 60% (95% CI, 41%-75%) in a group of patients with complex karyotype.

Transcript:

We also presented the data about progression-free survival. Now, of course, we all want to know how long patients remain off therapy and whether they [will] progress. After a fixed-duration treatment and 54 months of follow up, 70% of the patients are still responding; patients with unmutated [IGHV], 68% are still responding. Patients with TP53 aberrations are losing a little bit of response earlier; still, 45% of them are responding after 54 months of follow up.

These are very promising data. The fixed-duration treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax appears to be very effective in virtually all patients. Maybe we have to evaluate the effect [of the combination] a little bit longer in patients with TP53 aberrations.

Reference

Ghia P, Wierda WG, Barr PM, et al. Relapse after first-line fixed duration ibrutinib + venetoclax: high response rates to ibrutinib retreatment and absence of BTK Mutations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with up to 5 years of follow-up in the phase 2 Captivate study. Blood. 2023;142(suppl 1):633. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187128

Recent Videos
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Related Content