Phase 3 PENELOPE-B Trial Fails to Meet Meet Primary End Point for HR+, HER2- Early Breast Cancer

Article

The trial did not meet its primary end point of improved invasive disease-free survival in women with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The phase 3 PENELOPE-B trial did not meet its primary end point of improved invasive disease-free survival (DFS) in women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer who have residual invasive disease after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, according to the German Breast Group and Pfizer, which are collaborating on the trial.

Notably though, no unexpected safety signals were observed.

“Reducing the risk of disease recurrence in patients who have residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a complex clinical challenge,” Sibylle Loibl, MD, PhD, chair of the German Breast Group, said in a press release. “This unique trial was made possible through the collaboration and support from all the research partners involved. Despite this outcome, we believe that key learnings will emerge from the large number of biomarkers being analyzed from collected tumor tissue, which will help inform future breast cancer research.”

The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PENELOPE-B trial is comparing 1 year of palbociclib (Ibrance) plus at least 5 years of standard adjuvant endocrine therapy to placebo plus at least 5 years of standard adjuvant endocrine therapy. Overall, 1250 women with HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence who have residual invasive disease after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in the trial.

Patients included in the study scored 3 or higher (or 2 if there were lymph node metastases at the time of surgery) on the clinical-pathologic stage – estrogen/grade (CPS-EG). The CPS-EG is a validated risk assessment tool which combines clinical stage before neoadjuvant treatment, pathological stage after neoadjuvant treatment, grading, and estrogen-receptor status.

“This is the first randomized phase 3 study to establish mature [invasive] DFS results for a CDK4/6 inhibitor as part of the adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. While we are disappointed with this result, we look forward to continuing to work with our research partners to understand subgroup data and how these could inform the development of our next-generation CDK inhibitors in early breast cancer,” Chris Boshoff, MD, PhD, chief development officer of Oncology at Pfizer Global Product Development, said in the release.

“We are proud of the transformative impact [palbociclib] has had on the treatment of HR[-positive], HER2[-negative] metastatic breast cancer - a vastly different treatment setting than early breast cancer,” Boshoff continued. “Our commitment to the metastatic patient community is as strong as ever as we continue to generate new data, including the most extensive body of real-world evidence for a CDK 4/6 inhibitor.”

Over 190 clinical sites across 12 countries globally participated in PENELOPE-B. The study opened in November 2013 and closed recruitment on December 31, 2017.

Detailed findings from the trial will be presented at an upcoming medical congress.

Reference:

PENELOPE-B TRIAL OF IBRANCE® (PALBOCICLIB) IN EARLY BREAST CANCER DID NOT MEET PRIMARY ENDPOINT [news release]. Neu-isenburg, Germany & Frankfurt, Germany & New York. Published October 9, 2020. Accessed October 9, 2020. https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/penelope-b-trial-ibrancer-palbociclib-early-breast-cancer

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content