Physician Assistant Details Importance of AE Management in Follicular Lymphoma

Video

The education of patients on identifying and reporting adverse effects is a critical part of effective toxicity management.

Depending on the grade of toxicity, clinicians will determine which course of action is best to treat it. Jennifer L. Garson, PA-C, suggested one way to manage adverse effects (AEs) is to dose reduce, although such a strategy may also compromise the clinical responses that a patient has already obtained.

Garson, a physician assistant from Rush Health in Chicago, spoke with CancerNetwork® during an Around the Practice® filming which focused on the current treatment options for follicular lymphoma.

Transcript:

We have patients who are on therapies, and one of our biggest challenges is how we manage any AEs. We all know that, with any medication, there is potential for AEs. In patients who have low-grade AEs, where it maybe isn’t disrupting their quality of life, it’s usually a tolerable AE. We don’t do a whole lot outside of maybe supportive care if there’s mild nausea. We may have to prescribe some medication for nausea if they’re having muscle cramping or some of these other myalgias we can see with it. It’s more about the supportive care in that.

It’s when we get to the grade 3/4 toxicities that it becomes a little bit more difficult to manage because you are stopping therapy, waiting for some of those toxicities or AEs to resolve before potentially restarting the therapy. When you do restart it, you’re looking at dose reductions.

When you do dose reductions, there’s going to be some compromise in your overall response rates and your duration of response. There are always those challenges. In doing that, it’s educating the patient about what they’re looking for [in] teasing out those AEs. Some AEs could be manifested by something other than medication. Looking at that, and trying to figure out the best way to keep a patient on an overall well-tolerated drug in the setting of some of these minor AEs, is a whole lot easier than looking at these grade 3/4 toxicities and moving into the next treatment.

Recent Videos
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Related Content