Profiling Tests May Predict Chemo Efficacy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

News
Article

Future research may focus on the relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens, pathologic complete response, and whole transcriptome changes in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.

“The real-world data demonstrate [that] MammaPrint and BluePrint (have) clinical utility to predict the likelihood of achieving pCR after NCT in HR+ HER2-ESBC,” according to the study authors.

“The real-world data demonstrate [that] MammaPrint and BluePrint (have) clinical utility to predict the likelihood of achieving pCR after NCT in HR+ HER2-ESBC,” according to the study authors.

Use of the MammaPrint and BluePrint genomic tests may predict responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer (ESBC), according to findings from the real-world FLEX study presented during the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS).

The MammaPrint test classifies patients with breast cancer into high and low risk of cancer recurrence, as genomic signatures have potential to predict chemosensitivity and advanced treatment compared to standard clinical subtypes. In past trials, MammaPrint-determined high-risk subtypes tended to have higher pCR rates when using specific treatments.

“The real-world date demonstrates (that) MammaPrint and BluePrint (have) clinical utility to predict the likelihood of achieving pCR after NCT in HR+ HER2-ESBC,” the researches stated in their poster presentation.

FLEX is a trial consisting of 12,328 patients, all with ESBC, who were tested by MammaPrint with or without BluePrint. This study focuses on MammaPrint’s High 1 (H1) and High 2 (H2) statuses as biomarkers for neoadjuvant chemosensitivity within the patient population (patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative ESBC) who had been enrolled in the FLEX study (n=214).

Within the study, MammaPrint identified two subtypes, H1 (n=142) and H2 (n=72), in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Characteristics such as age, menopausal status, race, tumor stage and lymph node status were also analyzed.

MammaPrint, H1, H2, BluePrint and pCR were adjusted and analyzed through age, race, grade, T stage, N stage and NCT regimen, according to findings from the study.

Fifty-nine percent of grade 3 tumors were categorized in the H2 tumor subgroup, while 98% of H1 tumors were Luminal B. Within the Luminal B (a type of breast cancer that responds to the hormone estrogen, while also having the HER2 gene) subgroup, only 51% were H2 tumors and 49% were basal-type (an aggressive molecular subtype of breast cancer), according to BluePrint.

The H2 tumor subgroup had a higher pCR rate, at 29.2%, in comparison to H1 tumors, at 6.3% (p<0.01). Among the 35 patients within the basal-type H2 subgroup the pCR rate was 37.1% (p<0.001).

“Although both MP High Risk groups exhibit chemosensitivity, High 2 tumors have higher chemosensitivity than High 1 tumors. Future studies will evaluate the correlation between NCT regimens (TC vs AC-T) pCR, and whole transcriptome changes to understand the underlying biology of treatment response,” the researchers noted.

Within BluePrint Luminal B tumors, patients with MammaPrint H2 tumors had a higher pCR rate (21.6%) compared to MammaPrint H1 tumors (5.8%; p=0.03). MP H2 (OR=4.91, p=0.003) and BluePrint Basal-Type (OR=3.54, p=0.03) tumors were also associated with a chance of pCR.

“Response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy is currently being evaluated in patients with HR+ HER2-, stage II-III, MP High 2 breast cancer in the SWOG 2206 trial (NCT06058377) that is open to accrual,” the researchers said.

Reference

O'Shaughnessy J, Pusztai L, Graham C, etl al. MammaPrint index predicts neoadjuvant chemosensitivity in patients with HR+HER2- early-stage breast cancer in the real-world evidence FLEX study. Presented at: San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference; December 5-9, 2023; San Antonio, TX. Abstract: PO5-15-04.

Recent Videos
A phase 0 trial is seeking to assess the feasibility of aiding anti-cancer cells with cytokines to restore their function.
Although pembrolizumab addressed a long-standing need in adjuvant kidney cancer treatment, combinations with the agent may further bolster efficacy.
“The trial will be successful, or [we’ll] declare it a success if we see at least 3 of 24 responses overall,” stated Ravi, MD, BChir, MRCP, on the phase 2 LASER trial in RCC.
Success with the 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy would be transformative for the clear cell renal cell carcinoma treatment landscape.
An ongoing phase 1 trial seeks to prove XmAb819 as an effective treatment and ENPP3 as a plausible target in patients with relapsed or refractory RCC.
“The therapy is designed to prevent both CAR T-cell inactivation and to restore the anti-tumor immunity of the white blood cells that have gotten through the tumor,” said Marasco, MD, PhD.
Ongoing studies aim to combine base immunotherapy regimens with novel agents to potentially improve outcomes among patients with kidney cancer.
Investigators have found a way to reduce liver and biliary toxicity when targeting the molecule CAIX in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Neoantigen-targeting vaccines resulted in an absence of recurrence in 9 patients with high-risk kidney cancer, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
The Kidney Cancer Research Consortium may allow collaborators to form more mechanistic and scientifically driven efforts in the field.
Related Content