Proton Postmastectomy Radiotherapy ‘Should Be a Treatment Option’ for Breast Cancer, Says Expert

Video

Robert Mutter, MD, of Mayo Clinic says that proton postmastectomy radiation therapy allows for excellent tissue sparing in the management of breast cancer.

Patients should have the option to receive proton postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer when available, according to Robert Mutter, MD, an associate professor of the Department of Radiation Oncology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

During the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), CancerNetwork® spoke with Mutter about his work on a randomized phase 2 trial assessing the use of conventional vs hypofractionated proton radiotherapy following a mastectomy among patients with breast cancer.

In the trial, there were no significant differences in terms of 3-year disease-free survival among patients receiving conventional (89.4%; 95% CI, 80.0%-99.8%) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (92.4%; 95% CI, 84.5%–100.0%; P = .91). Mutter also emphasized the importance of gathering additional data to confirm optimal dosing and fractionation.

Transcript:

One of the main takeaways is that this study provides even further evidence that proton therapy for breast cancer provides excellent normal tissue sparing consistent with prior reports. It also appears to provide similar complication rates and similar disease control; there was no difference in disease-free survival between the [conventional and hypofractionated] arms. Our results, again, suggest that proton therapy should be a treatment option for patients at centers that have the proton therapy available.

Our results also suggest that [for] patients being treated with postmastectomy proton therapy, the 3-week 15-fraction course may be a reasonable option provided that fractionation is a part of shared decision-making. We really encourage patients who are being treated with proton therapy who are part of a prospective study or prospective registry, so we can hopefully gain additional information on the optimal dose and fractionation with these efforts in the proton community.

Reference

Mutter R, Giri S, Fruth B, et al. Phase II randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated post-mastectomy proton radiotherapy. Presented at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 6-10, 2022; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS4-05.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content