Quiz: Infectious Complications of Multiple Myeloma

Article

How much do you know about the infectious complications of multiple myeloma? Take our latest quiz to find out.

Question 1

Answer

B.13.4% and 9.7%

According to a meta-analysis of data from phase II and phase III randomized, controlled clinical trials, the overall severe infection rate for patients with newly-diagnosed, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)-ineligible multiple myeloma was 13.4% following IMiD-based induction therapy and 9.7% following PI-based induction therapy, respectively.

Question 2

Answer

D.All of the above

Severe active infections involving pneumonia, herpes zoster, HBV, HCV, CMV disease, tuberculosis, or HIV disease are contraindications for active antimyeloma therapy until they are completely resolved or controlled.

Question 3

Answer

C.4.4%

The infection-related death rate for patients undergoing IMiD-based antimyeloma therapy is 4.4%.

Question 4

Answer

C.10.5%

Among patients undergoing IMiD-based maintenance therapy following ASCT, the severe infection rate is 10.5%. This is not greater than prednisolone or placebo, but lenalidomide maintenance therapy involves twice the risk of severe infection compared to thalidomide.

Question 5

Answer

A.23.3%

Among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, severe infection rates are 23.3% following bortezomib treatment and 16.6% following IMiD therapy. However, these increased infection rates might reflect, at least in part, differences in underlying disease severity.

Recent Videos
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
Related Content