Quiz: Understanding Epigenetics and Genomics of Multiple Myeloma

Article

How much do you know about the genomics of multiple myeloma? Take our latest quiz to sharpen your knowledge.

Question 1

Answer

B.False

Despite a range of recently approved treatment options and a near doubling of 5-year survival rates from 1980, multiple myeloma remains largely incurable.

Question 2

Answer

D.All of the above

Multiple myeloma is a disease of bone marrow–dwelling, antigen-producing plasma cells. Gene mutations, gene copy number variation, microenvironmental cellular interactions, methylation, and other epigenetic modifications of gene expression are now all believed to play a role in multiple myeloma initiation and progression.

Question 3

Answer

C.Hyperdiploidy

Karyotyping and fluorescent in situ hybridization are used to categorize myeloma as either hyperdiploid or non-hyperdiploid. Hyperdiploidy is associated with better prognosis, and non-hyperdiploid myeloma tends to carry a poor prognosis.

Question 4

Answer

D.All of the above

Secondary gene mutations and translocations acquired by myeloma clones in the course of disease progression can change disease aggressiveness and treatment efficacy. These secondary aberrations commonly include MYC translocations; gain-of-function gene mutations in the oncogenes NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, and CCNDI; and loss-of-function mutations in the tumor suppressor genes P53, RB1, DIS3, CDKN2A, and CDKN2C.

Question 5

Answer

D.All of the above

Aberrant DNA methylation, histone methylation, microRNA expression, histone modification, and mutations in epigenetic regulation genes are all suspected to play a role in disease initiation, progression, and drug resistance. Epigenetic inhibitors appear to possess pleiotropic effects on several myeloma disease processes, including clone proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair and genomic stability, and slowing or counteracting acquired drug resistance.

Recent Videos
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
Related Content