Rana R. McKay, MD, on the Impact of the Phase II OMNIVORE Trial

Article

The expert from the University of California San Diego discusses the importance of the findings presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Nivolumab (Opdivo) plus ipilumumab (Yervoy) is the established first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but optimal duration of nivolumab and sequencing for ipilumumab remains unclear. Results from the response-based phase II OMNIVORE study, presented during the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program, demonstrated that delayed treatment with ipilumumab is insufficient to achieve a response in patients with RCC.

In an interview with CancerNetwork, Rana R. McKay, MD of the University of California San Diego discusses the impact of these findings, and what it may mean for practicing clinicians.

 

Transcription:

So, with regards to the impact of this study, you know, many individuals, out in clinical practice in the community are faced with patients before them and are constantly asking the question of balancing risk and toxicity. Does everybody need to get nivolumab/ipilumumab, there's toxicity that's associated with nivolumab/ipilumumab, there's this fear, potentially that may be associated with use of that combination, and sometimes there may be kind of off label practices. Well, maybe I'll just start with a nivolumab, and I'll add ipilumumab in if I need it. And I think, you know, we decided to actually answer that question in the context of a very cleanly designed trial. And really what we demonstrated with this, is this approach is really not the best approach for patients. Patients actually need upfront combination nivolumab and ipilumumab when that combo is being used. And so, this adaptive design of starting with one than adding the other and trying to salvage is really not the right strategy. So, I really think it actually helps clinicians say hey, you know, there's actually, you know, data out there to say that maybe this isn't the best approach. Unless I have a reason to really not add, to not use the ipilumumab, you know [if] there's patient comorbidities or toxicities, or maybe they have somebody with an autoimmune disease, I really should try to use what is the recommended standard as opposed to trying to come up with something that isn't the standard.

Recent Videos
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Common adverse effects following treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the phase 3 CLEAR study include diarrhea, hypertension, and fatigue, according to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP.
Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab appears to raise no new safety signals in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma after 4 years of follow-up in the phase 3 CLEAR study.
According to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP, 4-year follow-up data from the phase 3 CLEAR study confirm the maintained benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Alicia K. Morgans, MD, MPH, from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute indicates that patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer are able to stay on treatment for long periods of time with darolutamide vs enzalutamide and apalutamide.
Tanya Dorff, MD, spoke about how CAR T-cell therapy could be a potential new addition to the prostate cancer treatment paradigm based on data from ongoing studies.