Risk of CVD Varies Among Adult-Onset Cancer Survivors

Article

Some adult-onset cancer survivors have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life compared to noncancer controls.

Some adult-onset cancer survivors-including those with multiple myeloma, lung cancer, and breast cancer-have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life compared to noncancer controls, while others such as prostate cancer survivors have a reduced risk, according to a new study. Overall, the survival of cancer survivors who develop CVD is generally poor.

Previous work has found a substantially elevated risk of CVD among survivors of childhood cancers, primarily due to exposure to cardiotoxic therapies such as anthracyclines and chest radiation. “Less is known regarding the magnitude of CVD risk in individuals diagnosed with cancer at an older age (≥ 40 years), a population that accounts for 95% of new cancer diagnoses in the United States,” wrote study authors led by Saro H. Armenian, DO, MPH, of City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, California.

The researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study of 36,232 survivors of adult-onset cancer who were at least 2 years from diagnosis. This was compared to a matched control cohort of 73,545 noncancer individuals. The results were published online ahead of print in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Compared with the controls, cancer survivors in general were more likely to have several CVD risk factors. These included hypertension (65.9% vs 59.5%; P < .01), diabetes (23.4% vs 21.5%; P < .01), dyslipidemia (57.9% vs 55.9%; P < .01), overweight/obesity (43.4% vs 35.4%; P < .01), and a history of smoking (32.7% vs 21.1%; P < .01).

A multiple regression model was used to determine the risk of CVD based on types of cancer. The greatest increased risk was seen in survivors of multiple myeloma, with an incident rate ratio (IRR) of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.31–2.21; P < .01). There was also a significant increase in those with carcinoma of the lung/bronchus, with an IRR of 1.58 (95% CI, 1.30–1.90; P < .01); non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with an IRR of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.20–1.65; P < .01); and breast cancer, with an IRR of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.06–1.22; P < .01). There was suggestion of increase in survivors of kidney and ovarian cancer as well, though these did not reach significance.

Prostate cancer survivors, in contrast, had a lower risk of developing CVD than controls, with an IRR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84–0.95; P < .01). Other malignancies including bladder cancer, colon cancer, melanoma, and others were not found to be at an increased risk of CVD.

The 5-year and 8-year overall survival rates were significantly worse among cancer survivors who developed CVD than among cancer survivors without CVD, which was similar to noncancer controls. Though the vast bulk of subsequent deaths among cancer survivors were due to cancer (70.5%), CVD was the second most common cause (8.8%).

“Outcomes after onset of CVD in long-term cancer survivors seem to be especially poor, emphasizing the need for additional studies to characterize the treatment-specific associations with long-term CVD risk as well as the effect of therapeutic strategies to mitigate this risk,” the authors concluded.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
Related Content