(S041) The Role of Chemoradiation in Elderly Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 29
Issue 4_Suppl_1

With modern treatment, there appears to be a significant benefit to the use of combined modality therapy in elderly patients with LS-SCLC, even in those with medical comorbidities. For patients who would be expected to tolerate the acute effects of concurrent chemo-RT, there appears to be a significant long-term survival benefit over sequential therapy.

Christopher D. Corso, MD, PhD, Charles E. Rutter, MD, Henry S. Park, MD, MPH, Nataniel Lester-Coll, MD, Roy H. Decker, MD, PhD; Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine

INTRODUCTION: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in elderly patients is a frequent problem, with prior studies suggesting that 40% to 55% of patients with limited stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) are aged 70 years or older. A meta-analysis examining the role of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) in LS-SCLC suggested that there is no clear benefit to combined modality therapy over chemotherapy alone in patients aged over 70 years. In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate outcomes for elderly patients treated with chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy (chemo)-RT in the modern era using a national database.

METHODS: We identified elderly patients (age ≥ 70 yr) diagnosed with LS-SCLC (cT1-T4, cN0-N3, cM0) in the National Cancer Data Base from 1998–2006. Patients treated with surgery or RT initiated > 30 days before or > 270 days after chemotherapy were excluded. Patients were stratified as receiving chemotherapy alone vus chemo-RT. The group receiving chemo-RT was further subdivided into concurrent vs sequential treatment. Concurrent therapy was defined as those starting RT 30 days before to 90 days after chemotherapy began. Overall survival (OS) from the start of treatment was compared between groups using log-rank analysis. Conditional survival analysis was performed for patients who were alive 6 months after the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS: We identified 20,836 patients who met the inclusion criteria; 47.9% received chemo alone, and 52.1% received chemo-RT. The median RT dose was 55.8 Gy. OS was significantly higher in the chemo-RT group when compared with patients who received chemo alone (median OS 20.0 mo vs 10.7 mo; log-rank P < .001). This survival benefit was observed in elderly patients with no comorbid illness and in those with multiple comorbidities. Analysis of the treatment sequence revealed a significant difference between concurrent vs sequential therapy by log-rank analysis (P < .037). The Kaplan-Meier curves crossed at approximately 18 months, suggesting that there is initially improved OS with sequential therapy, but long-term survival is improved with chemo-RT. Conditional survival analysis showed that patients who were alive 6 months after diagnosis had a significant survival benefit with concurrent chemo-RT over sequential therapy (2-yr OS 35% vs 27%; log-rank P < .001).

CONCLUSION: With modern treatment, there appears to be a significant benefit to the use of combined modality therapy in elderly patients with LS-SCLC, even in those with medical comorbidities. For patients who would be expected to tolerate the acute effects of concurrent chemo-RT, there appears to be a significant long-term survival benefit over sequential therapy.

Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(P005) Ultrasensitive PSA Identifies Patients With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Requiring Postop Radiotherapy
(P001) Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the United States According to Health Insurance Status
(P002) Predictors of CNS Disease in Metastatic Melanoma: Desmoplastic Subtype Associated With Higher Risk
(P003) Identification of Somatic Mutations Using Fine Needle Aspiration: Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
(P004) A Retrospective Study to Assess Disparities in the Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Proton Therapy (PT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer (PCa)
(S001) Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Re-Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-A Fifteen-Year Experience
(S003) Weekly IGRT Volumetric Response Analysis as a Predictive Tool for Locoregional Control in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 
(S004) Combination of Radiotherapy and Cetuximab for Aggressive, High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Propensity Score Analysis
(S005) Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx Over Five Decades: Experience at a Single Institution
(S002) Prognostic Value of Intraradiation Treatment FDG-PET Parameters in Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
(P006) The Role of Sequential Imaging in Cervical Cancer Management
(P008) Pretreatment FDG Uptake of Nontarget Lung Tissue Correlates With Symptomatic Pneumonitis Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
(P009) Monte Carlo Dosimetry Evaluation of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery
(P010) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastasis: Toxicity, Outcomes, and Patterns of Failure
(P011) Stereotactic Radiosurgery and BRAF Inhibitor Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Associated With Increased Risk for Radiation Necrosis
Recent Videos
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content