Sotorasib Combo Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in KRAS G12C+ CRC

Fact checked by" Roman Fabbricatore
News
Article

Data suggest that sotorasib plus panitumumab may represent a valuable new treatment option in this KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer population.

In January 2025, the FDA approved sotorasib/panitumumab for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated CRC based on prior findings from the CodeBreaK 300 trial.

In January 2025, the FDA approved sotorasib/panitumumab for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated CRC based on prior findings from the CodeBreaK 300 trial.

Sotorasib (Lumakras) plus panitumumab (Vectibix) improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at different doses vs investigator’s choice of trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf) or regorafenib (Stivarga) among patients with KRAS G12C-mutated chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), according to updated findings from the phase 3 CodeBreaK 300 study (NCT05198934) published in The Lancet Oncology.1

From baseline to week 9, the estimated least squares mean change in fatigue at its worst was –0.48 (95% CI, –1.18 to 0.23) with sotorasib at 960 mg plus panitumumab, –0.17 (95% CI, –0.86 to 0.52) with sotorasib at 240 mg plus panitumumab, and 0.42 (95% CI, –0.35 to 1.19) with investigator’s choice of therapy. In each respective arm, the estimated least squares mean change from baseline to week 9 was –0.83 (95% CI, –1.50 to –0.15), –0.52 (95% CI, –1.18 to 0.15), and 0.63 (95% CI, –0.11 to 1.36) for pain at its worst; 4.23 (95% CI, –1.39 to 9.85), 1.29 (95% CI, –4.13 to 6.70), and –5.21 (95% CI, –11.27 to 0.86) for global health status quality of life (GHS-QOL); and –0.27 (95% CI, –4.54 to 4.00), 0.69 (95% CI, –3.44 to 4.81), –5.66 (95% CI, –10.24 to –1.07) for physical function.

Overall, investigators noted a meaningful improvement in pain at its worst for both sotorasib doses, in GHS-QOL with sotorasib at 960 mg, and in physical function with sotorasib at 240 mg. In the sotorasib at 960 mg, sotorasib at 240 mg, and investigator’s choice arms, respectively, the median time to deterioration was 16.09 weeks (95% CI, 9.54-not estimable [NE]), NE (95% CI, 10.68-NE), and 8.97 weeks (95% CI, 5.84-18.37) for fatigue at its worst; 33.17 weeks (95% CI, 15.38-45.42), NE (95% CI, 12.39-NE), and 12.24 weeks (95% CI, 8.11-NE) for pain at its worst; and 19.93 weeks (95% CI, 8.40-34.17), 13.52 weeks (95% CI, 8.68-NE), and 12.39 weeks (95% CI, 8.26-NE) for GHS-QOL.

“[T]he combination of sotorasib [at] 960 mg and panitumumab not only significantly improved clinical outcomes but also resulted in better PROs that covered domains related to fatigue, pain, and disease-related and treatment-related symptoms and functions. Although not statistically tested, the combination also showed decreased risk of deterioration compared with investigator's choice of trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib,” lead study author Dominik Paul Modest, MD, a professor in the Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, wrote with coauthors in the publication.1 “In the context of the exploratory nature of the PRO analyses, these findings suggest that sotorasib [at] 960 mg combined with panitumumab could represent a valuable new treatment for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated chemorefractory metastatic [CRC] with a favorable profile concerning its effects on [QOL].”

In the open-label CodeBreaK 300 trial, 160 patients were randomly assigned to receive sotorasib at 960 mg daily plus panitumumab at 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 53), sotorasib at 240 mg plus panitumumab at the same dose (n = 53), or investigator’s choice of trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib (n = 54). Treatment in the investigator’s choice arm consisted of trifluridine/tipiracil at 35 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 twice a day orally or regorafenib at 160 mg orally each day for the first 21 days of each cycle.

The trial’s primary end point was progression-free survival, with secondary end points including overall survival and objective response rate. In these secondary and exploratory analyses, PRO questionnaires included the Brief Fatigue Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, the GHS-QOL and physical function subscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire, and GP5 single item of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General questionnaire (FACT-G GP5).

Patients with KRAS G12C-mutant chemorefractory metastatic CRC who were naive to KRAS G12C inhibitor therapy, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 guidelines, and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible for enrollment on the trial.

The median age was 63 years (range, 37-79) in the sotorasib at 960 mg arm, 58 years (range, 34-82) in the sotorasib at 240 mg arm, and 65 years (range, 34-81) in the investigator’s choice arm. Across the treatment arms, 44% to 55% were male, 57% to 79% were White, and 83% to 100% were not Hispanic. Additionally, 68% to 72% had liver metastases, 55% to 67% had an ECOG performance status of 0, and 53% to 69% had left-sided disease.

In January 2025, the FDA approved sotorasib/panitumumab for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated CRC based on prior findings from the CodeBreaK 300 trial.2

References

  1. Modest DP, Fakih M, Salvatore L, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with KRASG12C-mutated chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with sotorasib plus panitumumab or standard of care (CodeBreaK 300): results from a phase 3, randomized clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. Published online August 11, 2025. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00352-3
  2. FDA approves sotorasib with panitumumab for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer. News release. FDA. January 16, 2025. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://shorturl.at/1WviB
Recent Videos
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Related Content