STAR Clinical Trial Controversial Among Some Advocacy Groups

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 7
Volume 13
Issue 7

The NCI brushed aside the concerns of some cancer advocacy groups and decided to begin the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR),expected to be one of the largest breast cancer prevention trials ever. Raloxifene (Evista) was approved

The NCI brushed aside the concerns of some cancer advocacy groups and decided to begin the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR),expected to be one of the largest breast cancer prevention trials ever. Raloxifene (Evista) was approved by the FDA in December 1997 to prevent osteoporosis. Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) received FDA approval in October 1998 to reduce the risk of breast cancer in women at high risk for the disease. The STAR trial will compare the impact of the two drugs on women at risk for breast cancer, with particular emphasis on side effects. Women in previous trials of both raloxifene and tamoxifen have shown an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, but raloxifene has not produced the endometrial cancer risk that tamoxifen has.

In announcing STAR, Donna Shalala, secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, said, “Women who are at high risk of developing breast cancer need more and better prevention options, and only through clinical trials such as STAR will we find those options.” But groups such as the National Breast Cancer Coalition have strong reservations. The group said in a statement: “What we do know about tamoxifen as risk reduction is known only for the population of women who actually enrolled in the tamoxifen prevention trial. It is inappropriate to study a different population of healthy women as planned for the STAR trial.”

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content