Study questions CMS coverage decision on CT colonography

Article

According to a recent study, the elderly are at enhanced risk for complications associated with screening colonoscopy.

A new study found some elderly patients are at risk for bowel perforation and other adverse events when undergoing screening colonoscopy. This finding comes on the heels of the CMS decision not to cover the less invasive procedure, CT colonography, in Medicare patients-a decision that most of the major cancer organizations felt was counterproductive.

The study, which was reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found that although the risks from colonoscopy are quite low, complications such as perforation, bleeding, and heart problems may outweigh the benefits in certain populations of elderly patients.

Led by Joan L. Warren, PhD, of the Applied Research Program at NCI, the researchers collected data on 53,220 Medicare recipients who had colonoscopies between July 2001 and October 2005. They compared these patients with a matched set of Medicare patients who did not have colonoscopies, looking for bowel perforation and heart-related issues.

Dr. Warren's team found that the beneficiaries who underwent colonoscopy had a greater risk of adverse events than those that did not have the procedure. Moreover, those who had a polyp removed during colonoscopy had a greater risk of adverse event than those who did not have polypectomy.

Although most experts agree that colonoscopy is generally safe for patients of all age groups who do not have underlying health issues, Durado Brooks, MD, head of the prostate and colorectal cancer prevention programs at the ACS, thinks the study raises questions about the recent CMS decision not to cover CT colonography.

In a press statement, Dr. Brooks said, "Given the possibility of harm coming to patients from colonoscopy, it seems ill-advised to withhold another potential screening approach that would allow physicians to have a complete view of the patient's colon."

CMS based its decision not to cover CT colonography on a lack of data in the over-65 population. Perhaps this study will lead to more research that will eventually convince CMS that a less invasive colorectal screening option will ultimately save lives and money.

Recent Videos
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Related Content