Subcutaneous Rituximab May Soon Be Approved for Certain Blood Cancers

Article

A new study is suggesting that intravenous and subcutaneous rituximab share similar efficacy and safety profiles.

Some lymphoma patients may soon be able to receive rituximab subcutaneously. A new study published in The Lancet Haematology is suggesting that intravenous and subcutaneous rituximab share similar efficacy and safety profiles. In addition, subcutaneous administration does not appear to compromise the anti-lymphoma activity of rituximab when given with chemotherapy, according to the latest findings from SABRINA, a two-stage, randomized, open-label phase III trial.

Currently, intravenous rituximab is the standard of care in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, a subcutaneous formulation could reduce patients' treatment burden and improve resource utilization in healthcare, according to the researchers. Andrew Davies of the University of Southampton, Southampton, UK et al found pharmacokinetic noninferiority of subcutaneous rituximab to intravenous rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma with no new safety concerns.

In this study, 410 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous rituximab (n = 205) or subcutaneous rituximab (n = 205). The researchers found that the overall response at the end of induction was 84.9% in the intravenous group and 84.4% in the subcutaneous group. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both groups and the frequency of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was also similar. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse event was neutropenia (21% in the intravenous group vs 26% in the subcutaneous group).

In March of this year, the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted unanimously (11 to 0) that the benefit-risk of rituximab/hyaluronidase for subcutaneous injection was favorable for the treatment of certain blood cancers. Included in this group of blood cancers are previously untreated follicular lymphoma, previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), relapsed or refractory low grade or follicular lymphoma, and previously untreated and relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

The new co-formulation includes the same monoclonal antibody as intravenous rituximab and hyaluronidase, a molecule that helps to deliver medicine under the skin. The FDA is expected to make a decision on approval by June 26, 2017.

“Subcutaneous rituximab can be administered in 5 to 7 minutes compared to an hour and a half or more for intravenous Rituxan [rituximab],” said Sandra Horning, MD, who is the Chief Medical Officer and executive vice president of global development for Roche and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group in South San Francisco. “The significant reduction in administration time could especially benefit people with blood cancer who may receive years of treatment.”

This co-formulation has been available in the European Union since 2014 and it is approved in approximately 50 other countries worldwide. In the United States, rituximab is currently approved as an intravenous formulation for the treatment of people with previously untreated follicular lymphoma, previously untreated DLBCL, relapsed or refractory low grade or follicular lymphoma, and previously untreated and relapsed or refractory CLL.

 

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
A new clinical trial aims to offer a novel allogenic CAR T-cell product for patients with lymphoma closer to home.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
Modification of REMS programs may help patients travel back to community practices sooner, according to Suman Kambhampati, MD.
Related Content